H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Taylor Dent H2H: 0-1
Taylor Dent holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Taylor Dent leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Taylor Dent won the 2003 Memphis third round 7-6(15) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 45
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Taylor Dent | 7-6(15) 6-1 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Taylor Dent | #979 | #21 | 1,345 | 1,905 | 148 | 138 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Taylor Dent | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #410 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #181 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #124 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #57 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 2003 | 28–12 | 70.0% | #33 | 1,883 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 2004 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #32 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 33–21 | 61.1% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #574 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #865 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #76 | 1,730 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2010 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #118 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |