Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2002 Adelaide International quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data | Jan 5, 2002* | QF | Adelaide International | ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Mark Philippoussis | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Todd Martin | Match data | Mar 14, 1999* | QF | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Todd Martin | 6-3 7-5 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Feb 24, 1996* | SF | Memphis | Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
| Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Todd Martin | Match data | Mar 4, 1995* | SF | Scottsdale | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,064 | 398 | 223 | 64.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,945 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,913 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,913 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #55 | 1,862 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,816 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,785 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,842 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,688 | 0 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1990 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1991 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1992 | 12 | 10 | 22 | 54.5% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1993 | 21 | 12 | 33 | 63.6% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1994 | 22 | 8 | 30 | 73.3% | 10 | 4 | 14 | 71.4% | 10 | 1 | 11 | 90.9% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 24 | 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1995 | 25 | 10 | 35 | 71.4% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% |
| 25 | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 29 | 10 | 39 | 74.4% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 26 | 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 26 | 12 | 38 | 68.4% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% |
| 28 | 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 30 | 11 | 41 | 73.2% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | — | 227 | 122 | 349 | 65.0% | 64 | 42 | 106 | 60.4% | 59 | 25 | 84 | 70.2% | 48 | 34 | 82 | 58.5% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | — | +1.05 | 1990 | 1516 | 114.1 | — | — | — | — | +28 | — | — | 40.0% | 0.00 | 2–0 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.50 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | — | -0.04 | 1991 | 1652 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | -62 | -40 | -7 | 55.8% | +0.56 | 2–3 (40%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +1.12 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | — | -1.16 | 1992 | 1724 | 141.4 | — | — | — | — | -19 | -110 | -46 | 55.8% | +0.54 | 4–9 (31%) | 8–8 (50%) | — | +0.21 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | — | -1.51 | 1993 | 1887 | 155.8 | — | — | — | — | -16 | -193 | -64 | 62.4% | +0.78 | 10–9 (53%) | 16–17 (48%) | — | -0.69 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | — | -0.59 | 1994 | 1945 | 157.2 | — | — | — | — | -18 | -177 | +80 | 64.0% | +0.94 | 19–8 (70%) | 26–17 (60%) | — | -1.38 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | — | +0.83 | 1995 | 1913 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -141 | +46 | 62.5% | +0.71 | 11–4 (73%) | 20–12 (63%) | — | -0.11 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | — | -2.36 | 1996 | 1923 | 161.1 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -122 | +82 | 66.3% | +1.07 | 11–10 (52%) | 15–12 (56%) | — | -1.56 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | — | -2.84 | 1997 | 1914 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | — | — | 63.3% | +0.53 | 2–4 (33%) | 6–3 (67%) | — | -1.34 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | — | +0.80 | 1998 | 1999 | 161.9 | — | — | — | — | +10 | -105 | -16 | 64.0% | +0.82 | 12–7 (63%) | 19–11 (63%) | — | -4.34 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | — | -0.33 | 1999 | 1914 | 156.7 | — | — | — | — | +32 | +22 | +54 | 63.2% | +0.70 | 14–10 (58%) | 26–16 (62%) | — | -0.18 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | -1.13 | 2000 | 1862 | 141.9 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +9 | +96 | 54.5% | +0.48 | 3–4 (43%) | 7–10 (41%) | — | -0.87 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1816 | 132.4 | — | — | — | — | +63 | -59 | +147 | 51.3% | -0.17 | 6–3 (67%) | 6–5 (55%) | — | -0.33 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1786 | 147.1 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -34 | +125 | 58.3% | +0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 14–10 (58%) | — | -2.19 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1842 | 133.5 | +2.69 | +0.10 | 1.096 | 51.8% | +8 | -108 | +98 | 61.8% | +0.46 | 1–5 (17%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -0.41 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1688 | 130.3 | +1.82 | +0.03 | 1.029 | 50.4% | +23 | +23 | +195 | 43.8% | -0.21 | 5–6 (45%) | 10–9 (53%) | — | -1.17 |
| 38 | 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | — | 2064 | 158.1 | +2.25 | +0.06 | 1.062 | 51.1% | +15 | -99 | +51 | 60.5% | +0.64 | 108–88 (55%) | 185–143 (56%) | 101.2 | -2.06 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 4 | 18 | 22 | Apr 27, 2002 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 5 | 13 | 18 | Jan 26, 2001 | H2H |
| Richey Reneberg | 8 | 4 | 12 | Sep 3, 1999 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 5 | 7 | 12 | Jun 30, 1999 | H2H |
| Yevgeny Kafelnikov | 3 | 7 | 10 | Mar 17, 2002 | H2H |