H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Todd Martin H2H: 3-1
Mark Philippoussis holds a 3–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2002 Adelaide quarterfinal 4-6 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2002* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 4-6 6-2 6-2 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1999* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | QF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 3-6 7-5 6-1 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1996* | Memphis | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-3 7-5 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Mar 4, 1995* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(3) 6-3 | Todd Martin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |