Mark Philippoussis
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC
Todd Woodbridge holds a 2–1 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Todd Woodbridge leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 1997 Indian Wells Open round of 32 7-6(4) 7-6(9).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | 7-6(4) 7-6(9) | Todd Woodbridge | Match data | Mar 13, 1997* | R32 | Indian Wells Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Todd Woodbridge | 7-5 6-4 | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | Aug 25, 1996* | QF | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Todd Woodbridge | 3-6 6-4 7-6(1) 7-6(2) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data | May 31, 1996* | R64 | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,010 | 291 | 193 | 60.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 11 |
| Todd Woodbridge | #1,151 | #19 | 1,575 | 1,870 | 239 | 231 | 50.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #213 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,765 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 33–23 | 58.9% | #30 | 1,840 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #50 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,854 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #77 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,908 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #54 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,890 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #109 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | 1994 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #90 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,804 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #33 | 1,811 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #36 | 1,754 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | 1997 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #26 | 1,801 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,716 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,655 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,602 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,731 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #187 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #207 | 1,597 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 57.1% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 9 | 3 | 12 | 75.0% | 1989 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 25 | 12 | 37 | 67.6% | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 1990 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 20 | 1997 | 20 | 9 | 29 | 69.0% | 10 | 3 | 13 | 76.9% | 5 | 1 | 6 | 83.3% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1991 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% |
| 21 | 1998 | 20 | 11 | 31 | 64.5% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1992 | 17 | 13 | 30 | 56.7% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1999 | 20 | 7 | 27 | 74.1% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1993 | 14 | 13 | 27 | 51.9% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 23 | 2000 | 28 | 13 | 41 | 68.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 1994 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% |
| 24 | 2001 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1995 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 2002 | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 20 | 13 | 33 | 60.6% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% |
| 26 | 2003 | 24 | 12 | 36 | 66.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1997 | 22 | 12 | 34 | 64.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 27 | 2004 | 5 | 11 | 16 | 31.3% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 2005 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1999 | 6 | 10 | 16 | 37.5% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2006 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | — | — | — | — | 8 | 2 | 10 | 80.0% | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 178 | 115 | 293 | 60.8% | 35 | 35 | 70 | 50.0% | 48 | 22 | 70 | 68.6% | 30 | 21 | 51 | 58.8% | — | 146 | 131 | 277 | 52.7% | 21 | 32 | 53 | 39.6% | 43 | 31 | 74 | 58.1% | 29 | 37 | 66 | 43.9% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 422/484 of Mark Philippoussis's and 360/418 of Todd Woodbridge's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 17 | 1994 | 4/4 | 6.0 | 4.0 | 58.1% | 64.9% | 40.4% | 42.4% | 25.4% | 54.8% | 35.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 41/42 | 11.9 | 4.9 | 58.5% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 70.4% | 41.4% | 66.6% | 36.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 45/56 | 14.1 | 5.9 | 59.0% | 81.0% | 47.5% | 63.5% | 37.3% | 67.2% | 36.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 56/61 | 13.8 | 5.6 | 58.7% | 79.5% | 51.7% | 61.7% | 42.5% | 68.0% | 32.9% | 1991 | 37/48 | 2.0 | 3.4 | 59.8% | 67.3% | 50.1% | 57.0% | 43.8% | 60.2% | 39.6% |
| 21 | 1998 | 41/50 | 12.6 | 5.0 | 58.5% | 78.7% | 49.7% | 59.9% | 40.0% | 66.8% | 35.5% | 1992 | 44/48 | 2.7 | 4.8 | 60.3% | 69.2% | 48.5% | 59.9% | 40.7% | 60.9% | 40.9% |
| 22 | 1999 | 33/45 | 14.3 | 4.8 | 57.4% | 80.6% | 49.5% | 63.7% | 39.4% | 67.4% | 34.9% | 1993 | 33/39 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 60.5% | 67.2% | 47.6% | 51.3% | 41.8% | 59.2% | 39.6% |
| 23 | 2000 | 49/64 | 15.6 | 5.5 | 56.0% | 81.4% | 52.4% | 59.2% | 40.4% | 68.7% | 34.9% | 1994 | 30/34 | 3.4 | 4.9 | 59.1% | 70.6% | 45.0% | 55.4% | 47.1% | 60.1% | 37.2% |
| 24 | 2001 | 16/18 | 16.4 | 3.8 | 56.8% | 79.7% | 51.0% | 64.7% | 34.2% | 67.4% | 35.1% | 1995 | 50/54 | 2.7 | 4.6 | 57.9% | 70.2% | 48.3% | 60.0% | 42.9% | 61.3% | 38.1% |
| 25 | 2002 | 24/28 | 16.2 | 6.6 | 55.5% | 79.7% | 53.3% | 64.7% | 46.2% | 67.8% | 35.4% | 1996 | 51/58 | 3.3 | 5.3 | 56.7% | 69.0% | 48.1% | 55.8% | 42.8% | 60.0% | 39.2% |
| 26 | 2003 | 51/52 | 14.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 79.7% | 50.9% | 65.8% | 51.6% | 67.1% | 34.4% | 1997 | 42/51 | 3.6 | 4.0 | 58.4% | 70.3% | 46.0% | 60.1% | 45.6% | 60.2% | 41.4% |
| 27 | 2004 | 23/24 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 56.8% | 77.3% | 45.9% | 57.2% | 39.6% | 63.7% | 33.2% | 1998 | 36/42 | 3.3 | 4.4 | 59.1% | 64.4% | 45.6% | 54.0% | 46.9% | 56.8% | 39.9% |
| 28 | 2005 | 19/20 | 12.2 | 4.5 | 62.8% | 77.2% | 49.4% | 56.6% | 34.3% | 66.7% | 31.2% | 1999 | 17/24 | 3.7 | 4.1 | 62.5% | 66.7% | 47.9% | 51.7% | 49.4% | 60.0% | 34.8% |
| 29 | 2006 | 20/20 | 14.0 | 4.9 | 55.3% | 79.7% | 48.8% | 59.4% | 34.5% | 66.0% | 33.4% | 2000 | 10/10 | 2.3 | 4.2 | 60.2% | 66.6% | 49.1% | 57.1% | 52.0% | 59.7% | 39.4% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 10/10 | 4.2 | 5.5 | 59.8% | 66.1% | 46.9% | 59.1% | 33.6% | 58.5% | 39.4% |
| Career | — | 422/484 | 13.9 | 5.2 | 57.6% | 79.6% | 50.0% | 62.5% | 41.0% | 67.0% | 34.7% | — | 360/470 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 59.1% | 68.4% | 47.6% | 56.8% | 44.0% | 59.9% | 39.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Todd Woodbridge | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1492 | 104.4 | -1.87 | -2.04 | 0.773 | 44.9% | +22 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | 1–0 | — | — | +0.05 | 1988 | 1453 | 103.4 | — | — | — | — | +59 | — | — | 21.1% | -1.53 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.38 |
| 18 | 1995 | 1766 | 149.6 | +4.26 | -1.00 | 1.098 | 51.6% | +23 | -186 | -194 | 55.4% | +0.51 | 9–5 (64%) | 13–11 (54%) | 109.1 | -0.34 | 1989 | 1573 | 126.2 | — | — | — | — | +14 | — | — | 44.1% | -0.68 | 2–0 | 5–2 (71%) | — | -0.39 |
| 19 | 1996 | 1840 | 149.6 | +4.59 | -0.57 | 1.113 | 52.1% | +22 | -218 | -226 | 57.1% | +0.49 | 9–7 (56%) | 19–13 (59%) | 103.2 | +1.05 | 1990 | 1705 | 141.6 | — | — | — | — | +26 | -177 | — | 47.3% | -0.16 | 8–7 (53%) | 8–5 (62%) | 106.3 | -0.46 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1854 | 146.5 | +5.16 | -3.42 | 1.028 | 50.7% | -13 | -55 | -123 | 60.3% | +0.36 | 17–3 (85%) | 23–13 (64%) | 115.1 | -0.04 | 1991 | 1704 | 135.7 | -0.60 | +1.97 | 0.996 | 49.9% | -11 | -147 | -95 | 48.4% | -0.03 | 5–3 (63%) | 9–8 (53%) | 102.3 | -0.95 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1908 | 152.3 | +4.61 | -1.16 | 1.069 | 51.2% | -5 | -126 | -84 | 60.1% | +0.49 | 7–9 (44%) | 14–12 (54%) | 97.0 | -1.16 | 1992 | 1676 | 141.7 | -0.77 | +2.88 | 1.047 | 51.0% | +48 | -130 | -62 | 49.2% | +0.12 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–13 (46%) | 101.7 | -0.18 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1890 | 149.4 | +4.70 | -0.77 | 1.068 | 51.3% | +38 | -161 | -21 | 61.6% | +0.54 | 12–10 (55%) | 16–11 (59%) | 100.4 | -1.51 | 1993 | 1665 | 133.1 | -2.39 | +1.69 | 0.971 | 49.6% | +31 | -91 | -53 | 46.4% | -0.11 | 8–6 (57%) | 5–6 (45%) | 99.9 | -0.10 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1895 | 148.6 | +5.41 | -1.43 | 1.113 | 51.6% | +21 | -144 | +61 | 60.9% | +0.61 | 14–8 (64%) | 26–20 (57%) | 102.2 | -0.59 | 1994 | 1662 | 123.5 | -1.35 | -0.55 | 0.931 | 48.8% | +6 | -162 | +27 | 46.2% | -0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 8–10 (44%) | 100.1 | +1.36 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1804 | 130.5 | +3.11 | -1.38 | 1.076 | 51.5% | +5 | — | — | 58.7% | +0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 5–7 (42%) | 89.3 | +0.83 | 1995 | 1811 | 136.8 | +0.19 | +0.89 | 0.983 | 49.6% | -41 | -183 | -91 | 54.0% | +0.06 | 6–6 (50%) | 13–7 (65%) | 104.8 | -2.85 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1772 | 147.8 | +3.64 | -0.25 | 1.099 | 51.6% | +15 | -59 | +179 | 50.0% | +0.35 | 5–3 (63%) | 8–16 (33%) | 95.9 | -2.36 | 1996 | 1754 | 142.3 | -1.66 | +2.21 | 0.980 | 49.9% | +8 | -93 | +11 | 56.4% | +0.32 | 7–4 (64%) | 16–12 (57%) | 105.8 | +0.28 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1882 | 149.2 | +4.49 | -1.14 | 1.047 | 50.9% | -35 | -127 | +200 | 60.7% | +0.48 | 10–4 (71%) | 17–12 (59%) | 109.2 | -2.84 | 1997 | 1801 | 143.6 | -0.92 | +3.35 | 1.040 | 50.8% | -19 | -148 | +69 | 58.1% | +0.40 | 7–5 (58%) | 12–9 (57%) | 102.4 | -0.11 |
| 27 | 2004 | 1650 | 118.2 | +0.10 | -2.14 | 0.915 | 48.5% | -8 | +49 | +352 | 41.5% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 5–9 (36%) | 91.8 | +0.80 | 1998 | 1717 | 136.8 | -3.37 | +1.99 | 0.923 | 48.5% | +12 | -51 | +123 | 46.8% | -0.22 | 12–2 (86%) | 6–12 (33%) | 100.6 | -0.66 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1656 | 122.6 | +1.88 | -3.91 | 0.939 | 49.2% | -52 | — | +334 | 48.9% | -0.15 | 2–4 (33%) | 7–7 (50%) | 96.6 | -0.33 | 1999 | 1603 | 123.7 | -0.75 | -0.98 | 0.870 | 47.8% | +69 | -37 | +208 | 35.5% | -0.95 | 4–4 (50%) | 6–5 (55%) | 100.5 | +0.58 |
| 29 | 2006 | 1732 | 128.9 | +2.70 | -1.85 | 0.984 | 49.8% | -151 | — | +285 | 49.1% | -0.04 | 5–2 (71%) | 5–4 (56%) | 104.7 | -1.13 | 2000 | 1589 | 116.3 | -2.34 | +1.34 | 0.976 | 49.6% | +38 | — | — | 48.3% | -0.24 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–2 (50%) | 95.9 | -0.13 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1598 | 112.4 | -2.79 | +0.59 | 0.950 | 48.9% | -17 | — | +231 | 43.3% | -0.37 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.55 |
| 38 | 2015 | 1708 | 98.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 2011 | 151.8 | +4.10 | -1.55 | 1.052 | 50.9% | 0 | -124 | +113 | 57.0% | +0.37 | 96–66 (59%) | 158–135 (54%) | 104.5 | -1.58 | — | 1870 | 141.5 | -1.32 | +1.70 | 0.980 | 49.7% | +10 | -122 | +24 | 49.1% | -0.07 | 79–58 (58%) | 102–93 (52%) | 106.9 | -0.57 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 3 | 6 | 9 | May 31, 2000 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Michael Chang | 5 | 3 | 8 | Aug 1, 2003 | H2H |
| Andre Agassi | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jul 2, 2003 | H2H |
| Richard Krajicek | 2 | 6 | 8 | Jun 11, 2003 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Chang | 3 | 14 | 17 | Oct 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Jason Stoltenberg | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 10, 1998 | H2H |
| Pete Sampras | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 10, 1999 | H2H |
| Wayne Ferreira | 2 | 6 | 8 | Aug 26, 1996 | H2H |
| Jan Siemerink | 5 | 2 | 7 | Aug 16, 2000 | H2H |