H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 13:16 UTC
Mark Philippoussis vs Wayne Arthurs H2H: 2-0
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–0 lead over Wayne Arthurs in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2000 Tokyo third round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 55
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2000* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-2 7-5 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2000* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R64 | Grass | Mark Philippoussis | 6-3 7-5 | Wayne Arthurs | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
| Wayne Arthurs | #368 | #44 | 833 | 1,781 | 122 | 152 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Philippoussis | Wayne Arthurs | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #561 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #187 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 | 1999 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #105 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 | 2000 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #83 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #77 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #52 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #101 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #161 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #244 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |