H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Philippoussis vs Wayne Ferreira H2H: 2-6

Wayne Ferreira holds a 6–2 lead over Mark Philippoussis in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Wayne Ferreira leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Wayne Ferreira won the 2003 Los Angeles semifinal 6-4 7-5.

AUS Age 49 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
2 6
8 main draw meetings
RSA Age 54 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 2, 2003* Los Angeles ATP 250 SF Hard Wayne Ferreira #25 6-4 7-5 Mark Philippoussis #20 Match data
Jun 14, 2002* Queen's Club ATP 250 R16 Grass Wayne Ferreira #47 7-6(5) 4-6 7-6(5) Mark Philippoussis #110 Match data
Nov 9, 2000* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Mark Philippoussis #14 6-3 6-7(10) 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #11 Match data
Nov 4, 2000* Stuttgart Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Wayne Ferreira #19 1-0 (ret.) Mark Philippoussis #13 Match data
Apr 19, 2000* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Wayne Ferreira #48 6-4 7-5 Mark Philippoussis #18 Match data
Mar 20, 1997* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mark Philippoussis #28 6-3 6-3 Wayne Ferreira #10 Match data
Mar 14, 1996* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #10 2-6 7-6(4) 7-6(5) Mark Philippoussis #28 Match data
Mar 16, 1995* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Wayne Ferreira #12 6-4 7-5 Mark Philippoussis #149 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Philippoussis #1,115 #8 2,296 2,022 287 190 60.2% 0 1 0 0 10 11
Wayne Ferreira #1,099 #6 2,701 2,022 483 314 60.6% 0 2 0 0 13 15

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Philippoussis Wayne Ferreira
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–3 25.0% #274 1,492 0 0
18 1995 25–17 59.5% #38 1,764 0 0 1990 2–5 28.6% #173 1,529 0 0
19 1996 31–22 58.5% #30 1,838 0 1 1991 26–21 55.3% #41 1,712 0 0
20 1997 43–18 70.5% #18 1,852 0 4 1992 48–24 66.7% #12 1,847 0 2
21 1998 31–19 62.0% #15 1,906 0 5 1993 38–25 60.3% #22 1,819 0 2
22 1999 30–15 66.7% #19 1,892 0 7 1994 66–25 72.5% #12 1,923 0 7
23 2000 40–21 65.6% #11 1,894 0 8 1995 55–25 68.8% #9 1,925 0 11
24 2001 10–8 55.6% #104 1,803 0 9 1996 45–24 65.2% #10 1,838 0 13
25 2002 14–14 50.0% #80 1,772 0 9 1997 26–22 54.2% #42 1,809 0 13
26 2003 34–18 65.4% #9 1,881 0 10 1998 33–24 57.9% #26 1,823 0 13
27 2004 8–15 34.8% #109 1,669 0 10 1999 27–25 51.9% #53 1,704 0 13
28 2005 9–11 45.0% #171 1,659 0 10 2000 41–21 66.1% #13 1,895 0 14
29 2006 11–9 55.0% #114 1,732 0 11 2001 16–21 43.2% #62 1,707 0 14
30 2002 24–18 57.1% #39 1,811 0 14
31 2003 24–19 55.8% #26 1,762 0 15
32 2004 12–15 44.4% #128 1,692 0 15