H2H data updated: 2026-10-17 00:00 UTC

Mark Vines vs Vincent Van Patten H2H: 0-1

Vincent Van Patten holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Vines in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Vincent Van Patten leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Vincent Van Patten won the 1982 Ancona round of 16 7-5 6-4.

USA Age 69 Left-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Vincent Van Patten 7-5 6-4 Mark Vines Match data Nov 19, 1982* R16 Ancona ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Vines #685 #110 0 1,658 8 24 25.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Vincent Van Patten — — — 1,850 — — — 0 0 0 0 1 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Vines Vincent Van Patten
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
23 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1981 7–4 63.6% — 1,658 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1982 1–17 5.6% #110 1,493 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1983 0–2 0.0% #342 1,480 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Vines Vincent Van Patten
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 9 7 16 56.3% — — — — — — — — 7 5 12 58.3%
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 9 18 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 12 6 18 66.7%
23 1980 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 6 2 8 75.0%
24 1981 7 4 11 63.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 10 8 18 55.6%
25 1982 0 6 6 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1983 7 7 14 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5%
26 1983 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 12 19 36.8% 0 7 7 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — 48 56 104 46.2% 3 10 13 23.1% 2 7 9 22.2% 44 35 79 55.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Vines Vincent Van Patten
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1466 103.0 — — — — — — — 14.3% -1.86 0–1 — — +0.38
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1644 134.7 — — — — +45 — — 58.0% +0.54 4–8 (33%) 1–8 (11%) 94.1 +2.80
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1754 136.3 — — — — +40 — — 50.6% -0.26 8–2 (80%) 5–3 (63%) 108.6 +0.28
23 1980 1498 109.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 1981 1832 146.6 — — — — +28 -287 — 47.3% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 1–1 — -2.90
24 1981 1659 130.5 — — — — +50 — — 55.6% +0.37 2–0 1–1 — +0.30 1982 1764 141.3 — — — — +80 — — 47.2% -0.27 7–7 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 98.3 -0.11
25 1982 1494 114.1 — — — — +108 -41 — 14.3% -2.43 1–3 (25%) 0–6 (0%) 92.8 -0.30 1983 1708 138.5 — — — — +59 — — 41.8% -0.46 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 100.5 -1.08
26 1983 1480 102.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.17 1984 1677 127.3 — — — — +47 — — 43.2% -0.48 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 97.5 -0.23
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1696 131.9 — — — — +11 — -211 42.3% -0.65 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.4 -2.45
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1646 112.4 — — — — +7 — — 41.2% -1.18 0–3 (0%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.18
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1627 102.5 — — — — +13 — — 50.0% -0.63 — 3–1 (75%) — +0.72
Career — 1659 122.3 — — — — +78 -41 — 28.0% -1.47 3–3 (50%) 1–8 (11%) 95.6 -1.03 — 1851 143.5 — — — — +46 -287 -211 47.0% -0.30 35–33 (51%) 23–31 (43%) 99.7 -1.35

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.