H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Bill Scanlon H2H: 2-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Bill Scanlon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Bill Scanlon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1987 US Open first round 6-2 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Bill Scanlon
USA Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 3, 1987* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Mark Woodforde #134 6-2 6-4 6-2 Bill Scanlon #99 Match data
Jan 11, 1986* Auckland ATP 250 SF Hard Mark Woodforde #127 6-1 2-6 6-4 Bill Scanlon #180 Match data
Dec 27, 1985* Melbourne ATP 250 R16 Grass Bill Scanlon #187 6-3 7-5 Mark Woodforde #135 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Bill Scanlon #996 #9 56 2,017 307 259 54.2% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Bill Scanlon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1976 15–17 46.9% #52 1,651 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1 1977 36–30 54.5% #37 1,723 0 0
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1978 14–21 40.0% #95 1,764 0 1
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2 1979 27–19 58.7% #41 1,839 0 2
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3 1980 37–29 56.1% #25 1,808 0 2
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3 1981 39–21 65.0% #30 1,879 0 5
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3 1982 31–24 56.4% #71 1,852 0 6
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3 1983 42–21 66.7% #12 1,923 0 6
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1984 20–17 54.1% #57 1,828 0 6
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1985 7–13 35.0% #180 1,668 0 6
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4 1986 13–13 50.0% #85 1,656 0 7
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4 1987 16–17 48.5% #99 1,562 0 7
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4 1988 6–12 33.3% #224 1,534 0 7
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 1989 4–5 44.4% #320 1,598 0 7
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4 — — — — — — —