H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Woodforde vs Fernando Luna H2H: 0-1
Fernando Luna holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Luna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1989 Rome second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1989* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-2 6-3 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Woodforde | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |