H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Grant Connell H2H: 3-0

Mark Woodforde holds a 3–0 lead over Grant Connell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1992 Queen's Club Championships round of 64 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main draw meetings
Grant Connell
CAN Age 60 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #86 4-6 7-6(1) 6-2 Grant Connell #116 Match data Jun 10, 1992* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Mark Woodforde #94 6-4 3-6 7-5 6-3 Grant Connell #97 Match data Jan 20, 1991* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Mark Woodforde #56 6-2 6-1 6-1 Grant Connell #126 Match data Mar 16, 1988* R64 Miami Open ATP 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Grant Connell #1,367 #67 517 1,755 67 97 40.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Grant Connell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1984 0–1 0.0% #555 1,497 0 0
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1985 0–1 0.0% #570 1,491 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1987 0–1 0.0% #123 1,472 0 0
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2 1988 10–17 37.0% #134 1,527 0 0
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3 1989 8–11 42.1% #94 1,592 0 0
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3 1990 19–21 47.5% #92 1,667 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3 1991 20–21 48.8% #79 1,666 0 0
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3 1992 8–16 33.3% #186 1,572 0 0
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1993 0–1 0.0% #946 1,562 0 0
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1994 2–4 33.3% #318 1,600 0 0
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4 1995 0–3 0.0% #713 1,551 0 0
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Woodforde Grant Connell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1985 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 9 13 22 40.9% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
23 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 16 16 32 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 13 14 27 48.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
26 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 7 11 18 38.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6% — 51 70 121 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 11 17 35.3% 10 13 23 43.5%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's and 65/75 of Grant Connell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Woodforde Grant Connell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7% 1991 36/41 5.4 3.0 58.5% 71.4% 51.2% 65.0% 37.8% 63.0% 36.6%
26 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2% 1992 20/24 5.4 3.4 58.7% 71.8% 50.4% 63.2% 24.3% 63.0% 33.5%
27 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5% 1993 1/1 7.0 5.0 53.6% 68.9% 43.6% 60.0% 50.0% 57.1% 37.9%
28 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5% 1994 6/6 6.2 1.8 63.5% 74.1% 41.9% 66.1% 9.5% 62.7% 33.5%
29 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7% 1995 2/3 2.0 4.5 52.6% 62.7% 43.3% 50.0% 66.7% 53.7% 31.9%
30 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6% — 65/164 5.4 3.1 58.8% 71.4% 49.7% 64.0% 32.1% 62.6% 35.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Woodforde Grant Connell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1497 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.16
19 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07 1985 1491 104.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.04
20 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67 1987 1472 98.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.10
22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00 1988 1527 117.0 — — — — +11 — — 41.3% -0.34 5–10 (33%) 3–6 (33%) 97.1 +0.47
23 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09 1989 1593 135.1 — — — — +24 — — 47.1% -0.06 3–6 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 98.7 +0.27
24 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18 1990 1667 139.1 — — — — +42 — -147 47.4% -0.08 5–8 (38%) 7–10 (41%) 95.7 -1.46
25 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26 1991 1667 133.7 +1.73 -1.76 0.990 50.0% +16 — -109 48.6% -0.20 9–7 (56%) 10–12 (45%) 99.7 -0.90
26 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48 1992 1573 125.0 +0.70 -2.70 0.904 48.7% +25 — — 37.3% -0.74 3–6 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 94.5 -0.07
27 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21 1993 1562 103.6 +1.33 -0.62 0.884 48.7% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.08
28 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31 1994 1601 111.5 +0.44 -0.56 0.898 48.1% -53 — -5 37.5% -0.87 — 1–1 — -0.45
29 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71 1995 1552 98.7 -1.23 -0.51 0.689 43.6% — — — 0.0% -2.83 — — — +0.29
30 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06 — 1756 134.7 +1.20 -1.88 0.942 49.2% +23 — -91 43.1% -0.36 25–37 (40%) 30–46 (39%) 92.5 -1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.