H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Greg Holmes H2H: 2-0

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–0 lead over Greg Holmes in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1989 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-7 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Greg Holmes
USA Age 63 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #36 6-7 6-3 6-4 Greg Holmes #184 Match data Mar 15, 1989* R64 Indian Wells Open ATP 500 Hard
Mark Woodforde #195 1-6 6-1 6-4 6-2 Greg Holmes #28 Match data Nov 29, 1985* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Greg Holmes #1,113 #22 50 1,849 82 92 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Greg Holmes
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1982 0–1 0.0% — 1,493 0 0
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1983 3–7 30.0% #308 1,530 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1 1984 16–14 53.3% #59 1,685 0 0
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1985 25–19 56.8% #27 1,701 0 0
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2 1986 16–17 48.5% #76 1,675 0 0
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3 1987 11–16 40.7% #117 1,613 0 0
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3 1988 8–14 36.4% #197 1,605 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3 1989 3–4 42.9% #347 1,641 0 0
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4 — — — — — — —
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4 — — — — — — —
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Woodforde Greg Holmes
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1983 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1984 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 16 8 24 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
22 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 11 10 21 52.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 9 8 17 52.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
24 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1988 7 11 18 38.9% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
26 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6% — 59 49 108 54.6% 1 8 9 11.1% 11 16 27 40.7% 11 19 30 36.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Woodforde Greg Holmes
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1494 102.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03
19 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.07 1983 1530 124.6 — — — — +80 — — 46.9% -0.03 0–4 (0%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.08
20 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.28 1984 1685 127.0 — — — — +19 — -156 51.9% +0.16 5–4 (56%) 8–6 (57%) — +1.36
21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.67 1985 1702 138.5 — — — — +68 -188 -161 54.1% +0.36 8–7 (53%) 9–12 (43%) — +0.87
22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) — -2.00 1986 1676 144.9 — — — — +13 — -89 50.6% +0.31 5–6 (45%) 7–12 (37%) — -1.35
23 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) — +1.09 1987 1614 133.4 — — — — +68 -107 -60 40.3% -0.49 6–5 (55%) 5–11 (31%) — -1.27
24 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.18 1988 1606 132.3 — — — — +28 — -48 34.7% -0.80 2–0 4–4 (50%) — -1.94
25 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.26 1989 1642 112.2 — — — — +2 — -42 45.5% -0.59 1–1 3–1 (75%) — -0.33
26 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) — -3.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) — -2.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) — -3.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) — -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) — -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06 — 1849 141.1 — — — — +42 -148 -108 47.7% -0.03 27–27 (50%) 37–49 (43%) 95.0 -1.50

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.