H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Mark Woodforde vs Jay Lapidus H2H: 0-1
Jay Lapidus holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jay Lapidus leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jay Lapidus won the 1985 Australian Open third round 6-7 6-3 6-4 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 67
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 1985* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Jay Lapidus | 6-7 6-3 6-4 2-6 7-5 | Mark Woodforde | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jay Lapidus | #621 | #34 | 0 | 1,798 | 76 | 106 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Woodforde | Jay Lapidus | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #272 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #283 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #283 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 26–17 | 60.5% | #40 | 1,777 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #81 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #65 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #150 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #145 | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,551 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |