H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Mark Woodforde vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 2-0
Mark Woodforde holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1995 Adelaide fourth round 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1995* | Adelaide | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1992* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 6-2 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Jeremy Bates | #1,314 | #54 | 700 | 1,717 | 116 | 174 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Woodforde | Jeremy Bates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #372 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #329 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #187 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #152 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #96 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #168 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #143 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |