H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 1-0

Mark Woodforde holds a 1–0 lead over Jimmy Connors in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1992 Los Angeles quarterfinal 6-4 4-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 8, 1992* Los Angeles ATP 250 QF Hard Mark Woodforde #91 6-4 4-6 6-4 Jimmy Connors #42 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109