H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Johan Kriek H2H: 2-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Johan Kriek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Johan Kriek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Johan Kriek won the 1988 San Francisco third round 6-2 4-6 7-6.

AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 1
3 main draw meetings
USA Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Sep 29, 1988* San Francisco ATP 250 R32 Carpet Johan Kriek #64 6-2 4-6 7-6 Mark Woodforde #37 Match data
Sep 23, 1988* Los Angeles ATP 250 R16 Hard Mark Woodforde #40 7-5 6-2 Johan Kriek #66 Match data
Jun 22, 1988* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mark Woodforde #54 7-6 6-3 6-4 Johan Kriek #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Johan Kriek #859 #7 268 2,052 380 223 63.0% 2 0 0 0 12 14

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Johan Kriek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1977 1–2 33.3% #278 1,510 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1 1978 22–11 66.7% #27 1,781 0 0
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1979 33–22 60.0% #35 1,879 0 1
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2 1980 39–24 61.9% #17 1,976 0 1
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3 1981 38–15 71.7% #19 1,955 1 4
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3 1982 41–21 66.1% #9 1,960 2 7
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3 1983 39–19 67.2% #15 1,952 2 10
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3 1984 37–17 68.5% #13 1,916 2 12
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1985 43–21 67.2% #14 1,907 2 13
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1986 21–14 60.0% #23 1,880 2 13
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4 1987 26–20 56.5% #48 1,737 2 14
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4 1988 25–18 58.1% #39 1,788 2 14
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4 1989 12–10 54.5% #52 1,700 2 14
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 1990 0–1 0.0% #413 1,683 2 14
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4 1991 3–7 30.0% #274 1,611 2 14
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,593 2 14