H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC
Martin Damm Sr holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Damm Sr leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Damm Sr won the 1998 Cincinnati Open round of 64 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Mark Woodforde | Match data | Aug 12, 1998* | R64 | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
| Martin Damm Sr | 6-4 7-6(3) 3-0 (ret.) | Mark Woodforde | Match data | Jan 21, 1998* | R128 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,921 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Martin Damm Sr | — | — | — | 1,731 | — | — | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Mark Woodforde | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,802 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,714 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,718 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,812 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,761 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,803 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,735 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,609 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,583 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Mark Woodforde | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1985 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1989 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | — | — | — | — | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1987 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 1988 | 23 | 10 | 33 | 69.7% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1992 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 1989 | 17 | 8 | 25 | 68.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1993 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 8 | 6 | 14 | 57.1% |
| 1990 | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1994 | 7 | 12 | 19 | 36.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% |
| 1991 | 7 | 11 | 18 | 38.9% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1995 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% |
| 1992 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1996 | 15 | 13 | 28 | 53.6% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% |
| 1993 | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% | 1997 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% |
| 1994 | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 9 | 5 | 14 | 64.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% |
| 1995 | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 1999 | 5 | 9 | 14 | 35.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1996 | 22 | 13 | 35 | 62.9% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 2000 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 1997 | 13 | 14 | 27 | 48.1% | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 10 | 14 | 24 | 41.7% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | 2002 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 179 | 153 | 332 | 53.9% | 41 | 54 | 95 | 43.2% | 48 | 43 | 91 | 52.7% | 45 | 44 | 89 | 50.6% | Career | 74 | 107 | 181 | 40.9% | 6 | 28 | 34 | 17.6% | 22 | 24 | 46 | 47.8% | 51 | 49 | 100 | 51.0% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Mark Woodforde | Martin Damm Sr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1985 | 1579 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | -12 | — | +27 | 58.6% | +0.41 | 1–2 (33%) | 3–2 (60%) | 98.8 | +1.07 | 1989 | 1492 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 1986 | 1547 | 116.0 | — | — | — | — | +33 | -49 | +94 | 41.7% | -0.80 | 3–3 (50%) | 5–4 (56%) | 102.1 | +1.28 | 1990 | 1478 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.15 |
| 1987 | 1648 | 124.1 | — | — | — | — | +11 | -154 | -35 | 49.3% | +0.15 | 6–5 (55%) | 4–5 (44%) | 101.9 | +0.67 | 1991 | 1504 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | +57 | — | — | 57.1% | +0.57 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.21 |
| 1988 | 1802 | 150.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | -238 | -103 | 56.2% | +0.39 | 9–9 (50%) | 8–7 (53%) | 104.5 | -2.00 | 1992 | 1546 | 125.4 | — | — | — | — | +65 | -88 | — | 35.1% | -0.91 | 4–1 (80%) | 2–5 (29%) | 103.3 | +0.26 |
| 1989 | 1715 | 129.3 | — | — | — | — | +66 | -145 | -42 | 53.1% | +0.08 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–8 (47%) | 99.1 | +1.09 | 1993 | 1647 | 128.4 | — | — | — | — | +28 | -196 | — | 44.8% | -0.40 | 6–6 (50%) | 8–5 (62%) | 105.4 | +0.61 |
| 1990 | 1718 | 128.5 | — | — | — | — | +12 | — | +3 | 50.0% | -0.05 | 3–2 (60%) | 1–5 (17%) | 97.3 | -0.18 | 1994 | 1630 | 133.5 | — | — | — | — | -23 | -172 | +21 | 44.4% | -0.32 | 3–13 (19%) | 9–10 (47%) | 92.4 | -0.61 |
| 1991 | 1633 | 130.1 | -2.30 | -0.49 | 0.885 | 47.4% | +67 | -69 | — | 36.9% | -0.96 | 5–3 (63%) | 6–5 (55%) | 101.8 | -1.27 | 1995 | 1619 | 133.0 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | — | 42.3% | -0.55 | 9–8 (53%) | 11–11 (50%) | 102.9 | -0.27 |
| 1992 | 1813 | 146.1 | +1.29 | +1.66 | 1.050 | 50.8% | +8 | -233 | -144 | 53.6% | +0.17 | 6–10 (38%) | 14–9 (61%) | 101.0 | -3.48 | 1996 | 1709 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +35 | — | -23 | 47.9% | -0.08 | 13–8 (62%) | 13–18 (42%) | 102.9 | +1.26 |
| 1993 | 1793 | 147.8 | +1.20 | +1.32 | 1.046 | 50.8% | +19 | -190 | -121 | 56.7% | +0.46 | 9–7 (56%) | 8–7 (53%) | 100.4 | -0.21 | 1997 | 1694 | 135.4 | — | — | — | — | +35 | -281 | +7 | 48.3% | -0.18 | 8–7 (53%) | 16–10 (62%) | 105.2 | +0.62 |
| 1994 | 1793 | 144.0 | +2.05 | +1.57 | 1.087 | 51.3% | +8 | -106 | -143 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 7–4 (64%) | 9–9 (50%) | 101.3 | -1.31 | 1998 | 1649 | 132.2 | — | — | — | — | +16 | — | +23 | 42.9% | -0.50 | 7–7 (50%) | 8–11 (42%) | 98.6 | -0.31 |
| 1995 | 1761 | 143.4 | +1.40 | +2.84 | 1.115 | 51.5% | -7 | -71 | -60 | 57.0% | +0.31 | 6–9 (40%) | 12–10 (55%) | 96.4 | -2.71 | 1999 | 1578 | 123.5 | — | — | — | — | +27 | -177 | +52 | 39.1% | -0.78 | 1–7 (13%) | 3–5 (38%) | 90.9 | -0.57 |
| 1996 | 1803 | 152.4 | +2.11 | +1.19 | 1.039 | 51.0% | +37 | -161 | -119 | 53.2% | +0.43 | 11–9 (55%) | 11–14 (44%) | 99.0 | -3.08 | 2000 | 1615 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | -72 | -159 | +102 | 44.2% | -0.34 | 7–3 (70%) | 6–9 (40%) | 105.2 | +0.30 |
| 1997 | 1736 | 142.0 | -0.58 | +1.92 | 0.993 | 49.9% | +5 | -6 | +26 | 51.5% | +0.08 | 6–10 (38%) | 11–9 (55%) | 98.9 | -0.85 | 2001 | 1514 | 96.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +91 | 15.0% | -1.90 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.77 |
| 1998 | 1748 | 139.4 | +0.21 | -0.55 | 0.962 | 49.2% | -9 | -86 | +48 | 52.0% | +0.15 | 8–10 (44%) | 7–10 (41%) | 93.9 | -0.36 | 2002 | 1525 | 111.4 | — | — | — | — | +15 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.75 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.13 |
| 1999 | 1610 | 125.8 | -1.05 | -0.14 | 0.914 | 48.2% | +18 | +2 | +120 | 39.5% | -0.32 | 6–7 (46%) | 4–11 (27%) | 93.5 | -0.93 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 1584 | 116.0 | -0.30 | +0.27 | 0.898 | 47.9% | +5 | — | — | 45.8% | -0.29 | 0–3 (0%) | 1–1 | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1921 | 146.3 | +0.70 | +1.19 | 1.018 | 50.2% | +18 | -119 | -13 | 51.6% | +0.11 | 93–99 (48%) | 111–116 (49%) | 97.4 | -2.06 | Career | 1732 | 136.6 | — | — | — | — | +17 | -170 | +36 | 43.3% | -0.43 | 59–60 (50%) | 77–88 (47%) | 101.6 | +0.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pete Sampras | 1 | 10 | 11 | Jun 12, 1998 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 6 | 10 | Mar 6, 1999 | H2H |
| Jim Courier | 5 | 5 | 10 | Jan 8, 1998 | H2H |
| Richard Fromberg | 7 | 2 | 9 | Jan 2, 1997 | H2H |
| Thomas Enqvist | 4 | 4 | 8 | Jul 29, 1999 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cedric Pioline | 2 | 7 | 9 | Jun 23, 1999 | — |
| Patrick Rafter | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jun 24, 2000 | — |
| Thomas Johansson | 3 | 4 | 7 | May 4, 2000 | — |
| Byron Black | 2 | 5 | 7 | Aug 18, 1999 | — |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jan 16, 2002 | — |