H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Patrik Kuhnen H2H: 2-1

Mark Woodforde holds a 2–1 lead over Patrik Kuhnen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1990 Schenectady round of 32 6-1 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Patrik Kuhnen
GER Age 60 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #79 6-1 7-6 Patrik Kuhnen #109 Match data Aug 23, 1990* R32 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Mark Woodforde 7-5 1-6 7-5 Patrik Kuhnen Match data Jan 8, 1989* F Adelaide International ATP 250 Hard
Patrik Kuhnen #108 6-1 6-2 Mark Woodforde #79 Match data Oct 9, 1987* R16 Swiss Indoors ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Patrik Kuhnen #1,341 #43 574 1,789 126 151 45.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Patrik Kuhnen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1 1986 1–3 25.0% #170 1,508 0 0
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1987 10–12 45.5% #83 1,582 0 0
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2 1988 16–16 50.0% #61 1,701 0 0
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3 1989 15–12 55.6% #69 1,744 0 0
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3 1990 23–22 51.1% #82 1,675 0 0
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3 1991 21–24 46.7% #86 1,661 0 0
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3 1992 16–23 41.0% #89 1,656 0 0
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1993 13–22 37.1% #119 1,631 0 0
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1994 6–8 42.9% #189 1,633 0 0
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4 1995 4–7 36.4% #187 1,614 0 0
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4 1996 1–2 33.3% #504 1,609 0 0
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4 — — — — — — —
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Woodforde Patrik Kuhnen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 5 12 58.3%
23 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 6 3 9 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1990 13 13 26 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
25 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1991 11 10 21 52.4% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 4 7 11 36.4%
26 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1992 11 12 23 47.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1993 4 9 13 30.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0%
28 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1994 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
29 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1996 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6% — 55 64 119 46.2% 17 27 44 38.6% 19 23 42 45.2% 35 37 72 48.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's and 129/147 of Patrik Kuhnen's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Woodforde Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7% 1991 40/45 5.4 4.0 55.4% 73.2% 47.9% 53.4% 49.0% 62.0% 38.5%
26 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2% 1992 31/39 8.0 4.6 57.5% 73.9% 44.8% 64.3% 38.9% 61.3% 35.2%
27 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5% 1993 33/35 6.0 3.7 52.8% 73.8% 47.3% 52.7% 43.7% 61.4% 35.1%
28 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5% 1994 12/14 5.4 3.6 59.2% 70.9% 49.8% 61.1% 26.8% 62.0% 36.9%
29 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7% 1995 11/11 8.3 3.7 55.3% 74.1% 44.2% 51.9% 42.6% 60.9% 31.2%
30 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5% 1996 2/3 12.5 6.0 58.1% 84.3% 44.1% 81.7% 50.0% 67.0% 27.1%
31 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6% — 129/277 6.5 4.0 55.6% 73.6% 46.8% 56.9% 42.6% 61.7% 35.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Woodforde Patrik Kuhnen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28 1986 1508 110.1 — — — — +42 — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 3–0 (100%) — -0.37
21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67 1987 1583 123.1 — — — — +5 -20 -85 43.9% -0.12 5–5 (50%) 2–6 (25%) 99.3 +0.03
22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00 1988 1701 124.9 — — — — -76 -125 -46 53.4% +0.05 5–5 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.7 +1.00
23 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09 1989 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 -105 -91 51.5% +0.12 6–2 (75%) 6–5 (55%) 105.7 -0.67
24 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18 1990 1675 136.1 — — — — +17 +15 -18 48.6% -0.14 7–5 (58%) 11–5 (69%) 104.8 -0.51
25 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.27 1991 1662 134.0 +0.64 -0.43 1.013 50.2% +11 -14 +54 50.9% +0.10 3–11 (21%) 3–8 (27%) 88.6 +0.13
26 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48 1992 1657 134.5 +0.21 -2.10 0.908 48.4% +18 — +40 43.8% -0.31 4–7 (36%) 9–10 (47%) 99.0 -0.13
27 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21 1993 1632 125.2 -0.07 -2.17 0.909 48.4% +13 -44 +14 42.7% -0.49 5–8 (38%) 8–8 (50%) 98.6 +0.06
28 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31 1994 1633 115.0 -0.25 -1.36 0.970 48.8% -15 — — 40.5% -0.76 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.8 +0.57
29 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71 1995 1615 117.6 -0.55 -2.86 0.797 46.5% +14 — — 37.0% -0.70 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — +0.15
30 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08 1996 1609 105.0 -0.52 -3.09 0.820 48.5% — — — 28.6% -1.14 1–0 0–1 — -0.02
31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06 — 1789 136.0 +0.15 -1.61 0.935 48.8% -1 -51 -18 46.8% -0.21 41–47 (47%) 54–51 (51%) 103.1 +0.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.