H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Mark Woodforde vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 4-0
Mark Woodforde holds a 4–0 lead over Peter Lundgren in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1991 Tokyo Indoor second round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 60
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
SWE
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 1991* | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Mark Woodforde | 6-1 6-3 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
| Aug 13, 1988* | Montreal / Toronto | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 6-0 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
| Mar 2, 1988* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Mark Woodforde | 7-6 6-3 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
| Jun 19, 1986* | Bristol | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Mark Woodforde | 6-3 7-6 | Peter Lundgren | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mark Woodforde | #985 | #19 | 1,291 | 1,922 | 313 | 294 | 51.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Mark Woodforde | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #127 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1986 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #181 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #67 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1988 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #42 | 1,800 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1989 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #75 | 1,710 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1990 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,716 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,701 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1991 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #88 | 1,631 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,711 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1992 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,814 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,608 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1993 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #28 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1994 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #43 | 1,792 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,566 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1995 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #51 | 1,760 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,531 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1996 | 32–25 | 56.1% | #27 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,532 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #46 | 1,731 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1998 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #58 | 1,747 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1999 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #130 | 1,611 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2000 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #321 | 1,584 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |