H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Mark Woodforde vs Tim Mayotte H2H: 1-1

Mark Woodforde and Tim Mayotte are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tim Mayotte leads 1–0 on grass, while Mark Woodforde leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1987 US Open round of 64 7-6 7-6 3-6 2-6 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main draw meetings
Tim Mayotte
USA Age 66 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Woodforde #134 7-6 7-6 3-6 2-6 7-6 Tim Mayotte #14 Match data Sep 5, 1987* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Tim Mayotte #20 6-2 4-6 6-2 Mark Woodforde #93 Match data Jun 12, 1986* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4
Tim Mayotte #1,103 #7 1,274 2,049 338 195 63.4% 0 0 0 1 11 12

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Mayotte
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1979 0–4 0.0% #420 1,453 0 0
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0 1980 4–4 50.0% #171 1,531 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1 1981 31–16 66.0% #33 1,802 0 0
21 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1 1982 33–22 60.0% #30 1,810 0 0
22 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2 1983 23–18 56.1% #16 1,904 0 0
23 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3 1984 23–20 53.5% #44 1,766 0 0
24 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3 1985 48–19 71.6% #12 1,915 0 1
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3 1986 26–15 63.4% #15 1,857 0 2
26 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3 1987 44–13 77.2% #9 1,982 0 7
27 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4 1988 47–16 74.6% #10 1,918 0 11
28 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4 1989 29–15 65.9% #13 1,917 0 12
29 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4 1990 18–19 48.6% #37 1,747 0 12
30 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4 1991 12–13 48.0% #115 1,717 0 12
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4 1992 0–1 0.0% #1097 1,700 0 12
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Mayotte
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
20 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1981 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 11 5 16 68.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1982 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 11 7 18 61.1%
22 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3% 7 6 13 53.8%
23 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 6 10 40.0%
24 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 19 5 24 79.2% — — — — 13 5 18 72.2% 16 9 25 64.0%
25 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1986 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 18 8 26 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 20 2 22 90.9%
27 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 1988 28 8 36 77.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0% 14 6 20 70.0%
28 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 4 11 63.6%
29 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0% 1990 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 14 7 21 66.7%
30 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1991 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
31 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1992 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
32 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6% — 131 85 216 60.6% 5 13 18 27.8% 90 36 126 71.4% 112 61 173 64.7%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's and 24/26 of Tim Mayotte's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Mayotte
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5% 1991 23/25 6.9 6.4 55.0% 73.5% 45.8% 56.6% 45.0% 60.9% 38.6%
31 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6% 1992 1/1 6.0 1.0 57.4% 63.0% 70.0% 33.3% 0.0% 66.0% 33.8%
32 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6% — 24/533 6.9 6.2 55.1% 73.1% 46.8% 55.6% 43.1% 61.1% 38.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Mark Woodforde Tim Mayotte
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1454 104.1 — — — — — +42 — 18.2% -1.27 0–1 0–1 — +0.10
19 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07 1980 1532 126.8 — — — — +56 — — 39.1% -0.43 4–0 (100%) 3–5 (38%) 105.4 -0.12
20 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28 1981 1802 138.6 — — — — -9 — -48 64.2% +0.75 6–6 (50%) 13–8 (62%) 104.6 +2.78
21 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67 1982 1811 143.3 — — — — -28 — +49 57.6% +0.55 12–11 (52%) 11–10 (52%) 99.7 -1.18
22 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00 1983 1904 151.7 — — — — -70 — +58 55.5% +0.31 6–4 (60%) 9–13 (41%) 99.4 -3.46
23 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09 1984 1767 146.1 — — — — +46 -313 +156 55.7% +0.31 4–8 (33%) 10–12 (45%) 91.1 -1.63
24 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18 1985 1916 157.8 — — — — +85 — +6 66.5% +1.07 11–7 (61%) 16–14 (53%) 99.7 -1.93
25 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26 1986 1858 145.9 — — — — -38 — +200 63.2% +0.63 8–11 (42%) 11–7 (61%) 92.6 -2.66
26 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48 1987 1982 154.9 — — — — +26 — +41 72.1% +1.58 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) 92.0 +0.87
27 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21 1988 1919 150.1 — — — — +19 — +104 67.7% +1.13 14–3 (82%) 11–5 (69%) 108.6 +1.19
28 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31 1989 1917 154.1 — — — — +8 -445 +83 65.0% +1.02 4–7 (36%) 12–7 (63%) 97.9 -1.91
29 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71 1990 1747 145.9 — — — — +38 — +168 50.0% +0.19 9–9 (50%) 8–8 (50%) 94.1 +0.07
30 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08 1991 1718 133.9 +0.08 +1.03 0.987 50.0% -19 — +211 50.0% +0.02 2–5 (29%) 8–4 (67%) 97.8 -0.69
31 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85 1992 1700 100.9 -3.58 +0.76 0.994 47.0% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.09
32 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06 — 2049 154.9 -0.07 +1.02 0.988 49.8% +12 -259 +73 61.2% +0.74 89–83 (52%) 122–106 (54%) 95.3 -1.63

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.