H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Damir Keretic H2H: 0-2
Damir Keretic holds a 2–0 lead over Marko Ostoja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Damir Keretic leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Damir Keretic won the 1986 Boca West first round 7-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 66
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1986* | Boca West | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Damir Keretic | 7-6 6-4 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1982* | Geneva | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Damir Keretic | 6-2 6-2 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Damir Keretic | #837 | #58 | 35 | 1,740 | 87 | 120 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Damir Keretic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #400 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #239 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #239 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #69 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #86 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #68 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #207 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #412 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |