H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Danie Visser H2H: 1-0
Marko Ostoja holds a 1–0 lead over Danie Visser in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marko Ostoja leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marko Ostoja won the 1985 US Open second round 6-2 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 64
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 31, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Marko Ostoja | 6-2 6-3 6-3 | Danie Visser | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Danie Visser | #749 | #59 | 191 | 1,709 | 92 | 129 | 41.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Danie Visser | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #93 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #138 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #72 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #145 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #83 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #136 | 1,635 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #143 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #141 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #197 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #405 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |