Marko Ostoja
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 2, 1985 | H2H |
| Jakob Hlasek | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 13, 1989 | H2H |
| Jimmy Arias | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 25, 1986 | H2H |
| Pablo Arraya | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 24, 1986 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 0 | 3 | 3 | May 30, 1986 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Francisco Maciel H2H: 1-0
Marko Ostoja holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Maciel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marko Ostoja leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marko Ostoja won the 1988 Forest Hills round of 64 7-6 2-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | Francisco Maciel | Match data | May 4, 1988* | R64 | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,710 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Francisco Maciel | #873 | #35 | 130 | 1,680 | 33 | 45 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #271 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #353 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,513 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,495 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 1979 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 9 | 11 | 20 | 45.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | — | — | — | — | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 12 | 15 | 27 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1986 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 22 | 1983 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1987 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 6 | 11 | 17 | 35.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1988 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1985 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1987 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 21 | 46 | 67 | 31.3% | 47 | 74 | 121 | 38.8% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 13 | 21 | 38.1% | — | 9 | 15 | 24 | 37.5% | 24 | 27 | 51 | 47.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 1979 | 1499 | 106.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 1506 | 104.6 | — | — | — | — | +29 | +20 | — | 32.1% | -1.32 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.93 | 1984 | 1481 | 98.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +31 | — | 36.4% | -1.55 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.47 |
| 20 | 1981 | 1590 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | -11 | -4 | — | 46.4% | -0.31 | 4–10 (29%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +0.33 | 1985 | 1518 | 113.2 | — | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | 45.8% | -0.29 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.75 |
| 21 | 1982 | 1583 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | -25 | +33 | — | 42.2% | -0.79 | 7–7 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.06 | 1986 | 1645 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | -76 | +39 | — | 53.6% | +0.06 | 8–5 (62%) | 8–4 (67%) | — | +4.80 |
| 22 | 1983 | 1586 | 107.2 | — | — | — | — | -1 | -10 | — | 35.5% | -0.97 | 2–1 (67%) | 0–3 (0%) | — | +1.99 | 1987 | 1607 | 125.6 | — | — | — | — | -44 | +56 | — | 38.7% | -0.74 | 0–3 (0%) | 0–2 | — | -1.10 |
| 23 | 1984 | 1613 | 138.3 | — | — | — | — | +51 | -37 | — | 38.4% | -0.71 | 8–7 (53%) | 3–5 (38%) | — | -0.97 | 1988 | 1533 | 106.5 | — | — | — | — | -19 | +100 | — | 38.5% | -0.50 | 1–4 (20%) | 0–5 (0%) | — | +0.64 |
| 24 | 1985 | 1547 | 119.5 | — | — | — | — | +46 | -28 | -24 | 35.8% | -1.07 | 2–5 (29%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | -0.25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 1545 | 129.1 | — | — | — | — | -18 | +34 | — | 36.8% | -0.79 | 5–5 (50%) | 3–7 (30%) | — | -1.03 | 1990 | 1512 | 104.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16.7% | -3.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.25 |
| 26 | 1987 | 1483 | 97.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | 9.1% | -1.91 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1988 | 1513 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | -2 | -5 | — | 36.8% | -1.21 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | -0.38 | 1992 | 1507 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 28 | 1989 | 1512 | 115.0 | — | — | — | — | -23 | +16 | — | 35.5% | -1.19 | 2–1 (67%) | 3–3 (50%) | — | +0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 1495 | 100.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | 0.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1710 | 131.7 | — | — | — | — | +11 | +7 | -24 | 38.3% | -0.85 | 34–41 (45%) | 26–35 (43%) | 99.5 | +0.74 | — | 1680 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | -54 | +38 | — | 45.7% | -0.40 | 11–16 (41%) | 8–11 (42%) | 93.4 | +6.68 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Francisco Maciel
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ramesh Krishnan | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 27, 1987 | H2H |
| Horacio de la Pena | 0 | 2 | 2 | Aug 1, 1990 | H2H |
| Ronald Agenor | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 24, 1987 | H2H |
| Emilio Sanchez | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 18, 1987 | H2H |
| Fernando Luna | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 17, 1987 | H2H |