H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Marcos Hocevar H2H: 2-1
Marko Ostoja holds a 2–1 lead over Marcos Hocevar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Marko Ostoja leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Marko Ostoja won the 1984 Boston second round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 70
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 1984* | Boston | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Marko Ostoja | 6-4 7-5 | Marcos Hocevar | Match data |
| Jul 9, 1981* | Gstaad | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcos Hocevar | 6-1 6-0 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1981* | Brussels | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Marko Ostoja | 6-1 6-4 | Marcos Hocevar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Marcos Hocevar | #1,124 | #30 | 23 | 1,818 | 80 | 94 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Marcos Hocevar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 13–9 | 59.1% | #52 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 11–19 | 36.7% | #98 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #39 | 1,808 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 17–28 | 37.8% | #94 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #133 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #202 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |