H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Mark Dickson H2H: 1-2
Mark Dickson holds a 2–1 lead over Marko Ostoja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Mark Dickson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Mark Dickson won the 1984 Treviso third round 7-5 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 66
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1984* | Treviso | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Mark Dickson | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1984* | Washington | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Marko Ostoja | 2-6 6-3 6-4 | Mark Dickson | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1982* | Cologne | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Mark Dickson | 6-1 6-4 | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mark Dickson | #1,095 | #32 | 0 | 1,817 | 128 | 118 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Mark Dickson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #41 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #66 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #74 | 1,717 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #131 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #155 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,624 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |