H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Marko Ostoja vs Roberto Arguello H2H: 0-1
Roberto Arguello holds a 1–0 lead over Marko Ostoja in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberto Arguello leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberto Arguello won the 1989 St. Vincent fourth round 2-6 1-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 65
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 1989* | St. Vincent | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Roberto Arguello | 2-6 1-2 (ret.) | Marko Ostoja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marko Ostoja | #1,220 | #74 | 92 | 1,711 | 77 | 136 | 36.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Marko Ostoja | Roberto Arguello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #203 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #203 | 1,591 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #172 | 1,583 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #95 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #166 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #136 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #467 | 1,482 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #224 | 1,511 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #624 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |