H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Markus Hipfl vs Marc Kevin Goellner H2H: 1-0
Markus Hipfl holds a 1–0 lead over Marc Kevin Goellner in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Markus Hipfl leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Markus Hipfl won the 2000 St. Poelten third round 7-6(5) 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 55
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2000* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Markus Hipfl | 7-6(5) 3-6 6-2 | Marc Kevin Goellner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Marc Kevin Goellner | #1,172 | #26 | 1,072 | 1,841 | 152 | 188 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Marc Kevin Goellner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #109 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 33–25 | 56.9% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #79 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #78 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #53 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 22–34 | 39.3% | #51 | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–25 | 30.6% | #118 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #324 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #189 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #176 | 1,542 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #311 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |