H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Markus Hipfl vs Nicolas Thomann H2H: 0-1
Nicolas Thomann holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Thomann leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Thomann won the 2002 Wimbledon first round 6-1 7-6(3) 3-6 4-6 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 53
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2002* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Nicolas Thomann | 6-1 7-6(3) 3-6 4-6 11-9 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Thomann | #806 | #106 | 350 | 1,641 | 14 | 25 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #139 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #384 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |