Markus Hipfl
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Fernando Vicente | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 24, 2002 | H2H |
| Stefan Koubek | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 24, 2002 | H2H |
| Alberto Martin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 18, 2002 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC
Nicolas Thomann holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicolas Thomann leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicolas Thomann won the 2002 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 7-6(3) 3-6 4-6 11-9.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicolas Thomann | 6-1 7-6(3) 3-6 4-6 11-9 | Markus Hipfl | Match data | Jun 26, 2002* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicolas Thomann | #806 | #106 | 350 | 1,641 | 14 | 25 | 35.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #255 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #223 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #139 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #384 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #193 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #433 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1994 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 14 | 10 | 24 | 58.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 7 | 7 | 14 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 5 | 17 | 22 | 22.7% | 49 | 53 | 102 | 48.0% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 8 | 11 | 19 | 42.1% | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 116/133 of Markus Hipfl's and 37/39 of Nicolas Thomann's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 6.0 | 66.2% | 57.8% | 39.1% | 71.4% | 0.0% | 51.5% | 27.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 1/1 | 2.0 | 6.0 | 49.1% | 51.9% | 39.3% | 16.7% | 20.0% | 45.5% | 34.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 3/3 | 1.7 | 4.3 | 43.0% | 62.8% | 49.0% | 60.8% | 40.6% | 54.8% | 40.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1/2 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 50.9% | 62.1% | 44.6% | 50.0% | 80.0% | 53.5% | 46.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 5/6 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 67.6% | 60.0% | 50.6% | 51.0% | 33.6% | 56.7% | 38.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 26/30 | 2.3 | 1.8 | 66.3% | 66.5% | 49.6% | 37.2% | 42.6% | 61.0% | 42.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 16/20 | 2.1 | 2.2 | 64.6% | 64.9% | 50.9% | 54.0% | 52.2% | 59.7% | 39.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 26/32 | 2.1 | 2.9 | 61.4% | 63.6% | 48.6% | 51.5% | 38.5% | 58.1% | 39.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 27/28 | 3.3 | 2.2 | 65.1% | 63.3% | 50.1% | 50.8% | 46.7% | 58.2% | 39.0% | 1997 | 2/2 | 11.5 | 4.0 | 61.2% | 76.9% | 57.7% | 70.5% | 7.1% | 69.4% | 28.7% |
| 25 | 2003 | 9/9 | 0.9 | 1.9 | 71.7% | 56.3% | 41.2% | 46.4% | 38.4% | 52.0% | 33.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 63.1% | 60.4% | 48.4% | 71.4% | 40.0% | 56.0% | 39.0% | 2000 | 4/4 | 5.3 | 2.0 | 56.3% | 76.7% | 56.9% | 78.9% | 29.5% | 68.1% | 32.9% |
| 28 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 6/7 | 10.2 | 4.0 | 57.1% | 73.5% | 46.3% | 59.1% | 31.9% | 62.5% | 34.1% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 5/6 | 11.0 | 3.8 | 58.5% | 74.4% | 54.9% | 52.1% | 29.0% | 66.5% | 34.9% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10/10 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 53.2% | 79.1% | 53.0% | 60.3% | 39.4% | 66.6% | 37.0% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 3.2 | 54.4% | 74.3% | 49.6% | 71.0% | 28.6% | 62.7% | 26.5% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3/3 | 7.0 | 2.0 | 58.9% | 74.0% | 55.7% | 38.5% | 47.8% | 64.6% | 36.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2/2 | 2.5 | 1.0 | 51.8% | 60.8% | 51.2% | 52.8% | 5.6% | 56.2% | 33.4% |
| Career | — | 116/133 | 2.3 | 2.4 | 64.2% | 63.4% | 48.8% | 48.3% | 42.9% | 58.2% | 39.4% | — | 37/39 | 7.3 | 3.3 | 55.9% | 75.1% | 52.5% | 60.8% | 31.4% | 65.0% | 33.7% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Nicolas Thomann | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1994 | 1491 | 99.9 | +1.43 | -2.60 | 0.570 | 41.7% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 1485 | 101.0 | +0.52 | +1.20 | 0.633 | 40.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1493 | 109.0 | -1.54 | +0.61 | 0.895 | 47.2% | — | — | — | 42.9% | -1.14 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 1462 | 98.2 | -0.14 | -2.54 | 0.995 | 49.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 1508 | 114.6 | -0.71 | +0.31 | 0.894 | 47.3% | — | +41 | — | 46.7% | -0.40 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | -0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 1591 | 128.5 | -0.84 | +2.00 | 1.075 | 50.9% | -78 | +74 | — | 52.6% | +0.26 | 2–6 (25%) | 1–4 (20%) | 94.1 | +1.06 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 1571 | 126.9 | -1.56 | +0.32 | 0.972 | 49.4% | -93 | +109 | — | 43.1% | -0.69 | 3–4 (43%) | 5–2 (71%) | 103.0 | -0.49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2001 | 1574 | 134.5 | -2.21 | +1.33 | 0.953 | 49.0% | -129 | +138 | -96 | 48.6% | -0.18 | 4–4 (50%) | 3–3 (50%) | 101.2 | -1.27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2002 | 1567 | 127.4 | -2.40 | +0.71 | 0.934 | 48.7% | -69 | +91 | — | 47.1% | -0.21 | 0–7 (0%) | 4–4 (50%) | 92.2 | +0.81 | 1997 | 1493 | 112.7 | -3.14 | +3.57 | 0.936 | 48.5% | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.33 |
| 25 | 2003 | 1509 | 95.1 | -5.51 | -3.56 | 0.693 | 43.6% | — | +73 | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2004 | 1495 | 96.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2005 | 1477 | 99.0 | +0.24 | -0.09 | 0.886 | 47.6% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.22 | 2000 | 1535 | 119.3 | +1.01 | -0.41 | 1.032 | 50.5% | +30 | — | — | 55.6% | -0.11 | 0–1 | 2–0 | — | -0.24 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1510 | 108.4 | +0.92 | -1.21 | 0.910 | 48.6% | +33 | -12 | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | 98.0 | +0.28 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1618 | 119.2 | +1.85 | -1.64 | 1.044 | 50.2% | -26 | — | — | 36.8% | -0.84 | 1–1 | 1–1 | — | +0.09 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1606 | 115.0 | +1.21 | -0.34 | 1.110 | 51.4% | +34 | — | — | 66.7% | +0.71 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–1 (67%) | 99.8 | +0.65 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1541 | 106.6 | -0.24 | -2.35 | 0.710 | 45.3% | +102 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.50 | 0–2 | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.36 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1545 | 109.8 | -1.02 | -0.29 | 1.033 | 49.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.09 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1488 | 97.2 | -3.61 | -1.79 | 0.761 | 43.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | -0.13 |
| Career | — | 1687 | 129.6 | -1.94 | +0.67 | 0.942 | 48.7% | -90 | +96 | -96 | 46.1% | -0.38 | 13–27 (33%) | 17–14 (55%) | 95.8 | +0.24 | — | 1641 | 120.3 | +0.36 | -0.80 | 0.963 | 49.2% | +32 | -12 | — | 42.1% | -0.65 | 3–9 (25%) | 10–8 (56%) | 96.8 | -0.33 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jiri Novak | 0 | 4 | 4 | Mar 20, 2002 | H2H |
| Andrea Gaudenzi | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 13, 2003 | H2H |
| Fernando Vicente | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 24, 2002 | H2H |
| Stefan Koubek | 3 | 0 | 3 | May 24, 2002 | H2H |
| Alberto Martin | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 18, 2002 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger Federer | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 30, 2004 | H2H |
| Nicolas Kiefer | 1 | 1 | 2 | Jul 31, 2003 | H2H |
| Mark Philippoussis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Oct 16, 1997 | H2H |
| Philipp Kohlschreiber | 0 | 1 | 1 | Oct 26, 2006 | H2H |
| Greg Rusedski | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 16, 2006 | H2H |