H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Markus Hipfl vs Oleg Ogorodov H2H: 0-1
Oleg Ogorodov holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Oleg Ogorodov leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Oleg Ogorodov won the 2002 Roland Garros first round 6-7(8) 6-1 2-6 7-5 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
UZB
Age 54
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Oleg Ogorodov | 6-7(8) 6-1 2-6 7-5 9-7 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oleg Ogorodov | #1,528 | #101 | 469 | 1,563 | 19 | 45 | 29.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Oleg Ogorodov | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #112 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #140 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #142 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #225 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #132 | 1,410 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #230 | 1,402 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #166 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |