H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Markus Hipfl vs Sargis Sargsian H2H: 0-1
Sargis Sargsian holds a 1–0 lead over Markus Hipfl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sargis Sargsian leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sargis Sargsian won the 1999 Bucharest third round 6-1 0-6 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 48
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARM
Age 53
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1999* | Bucharest | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sargis Sargsian | 6-1 0-6 6-0 | Markus Hipfl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Markus Hipfl | #1,538 | #63 | 678 | 1,686 | 55 | 78 | 41.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sargis Sargsian | #1,525 | #38 | 978 | 1,811 | 155 | 205 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Markus Hipfl | Sargis Sargsian | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1275 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #451 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #231 | 1,462 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1998 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #137 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #615 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2000 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #119 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #76 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #104 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #125 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #279 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #98 | 1,623 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #59 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1102 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #94 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #72 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #103 | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #39 | 1,774 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #75 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #294 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #809 | 1,576 | 0 | 1 |