H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 0-2
Amos Mansdorf holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Jaite in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Amos Mansdorf leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Amos Mansdorf won the 1990 Paris Masters second round 6-7 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ISR
Age 60
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 31, 1990* | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Carpet | Amos Mansdorf | 6-7 6-3 6-0 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1989* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Amos Mansdorf | 6-7 6-4 7-6 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Amos Mansdorf | #514 | #18 | 1,184 | 1,897 | 288 | 214 | 57.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Amos Mansdorf | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #270 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #84 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #37 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #27 | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 31–16 | 66.0% | #26 | 1,853 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #39 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #33 | 1,827 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1991 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #62 | 1,738 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 35–27 | 56.5% | #25 | 1,771 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #25 | 1,787 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #69 | 1,692 | 0 | 6 |