H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Brad Drewett H2H: 1-1
Martin Jaite and Brad Drewett are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay, while Brad Drewett leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1986 Kitzbuhel fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
AUS
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 1986* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-4 6-4 | Brad Drewett | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1985* | Cincinnati | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Brad Drewett | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Brad Drewett | #1,018 | #34 | 170 | 1,763 | 181 | 225 | 44.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Brad Drewett | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #193 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #187 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #133 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #115 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #100 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #133 | 1,554 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #76 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #75 | 1,671 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #163 | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #154 | 1,557 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #99 | 1,613 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #151 | 1,581 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #583 | 1,547 | 0 | 2 |