H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Carl Uwe Steeb H2H: 1-1
Martin Jaite and Carl Uwe Steeb are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on carpet, while Carl Uwe Steeb leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Carl Uwe Steeb won the 1992 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 4-6 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Left-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 1992* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Carl Uwe Steeb | 6-2 4-6 7-6(5) | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Nov 2, 1989* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Martin Jaite | 2-6 6-4 7-6 | Carl Uwe Steeb | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Carl Uwe Steeb | #1,355 | #14 | 1,095 | 1,920 | 189 | 190 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Carl Uwe Steeb | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #73 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #15 | 1,857 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 27–27 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,745 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1992 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #29 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1993 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #94 | 1,718 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1994 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #89 | 1,607 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1995 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #67 | 1,660 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #179 | 1,540 | 0 | 3 |