H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-0
Martin Jaite holds a 1–0 lead over David Prinosil in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1992 Athens third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1992* | Athens | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-4 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |