H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Fernando Luna H2H: 2-1
Martin Jaite holds a 2–1 lead over Fernando Luna in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1988 Madrid third round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 1988* | Madrid | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-4 6-1 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Jul 25, 1986* | Boston | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-1 7-5 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1985* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-1 6-3 | Fernando Luna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |