H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Heinz Gunthardt H2H: 1-1
Martin Jaite and Heinz Gunthardt are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 1–0 on clay, while Heinz Gunthardt leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Heinz Gunthardt won the 1985 US Open third round 6-7 3-6 7-6 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 67
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 1985* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Heinz Gunthardt | 6-7 3-6 7-6 6-4 6-1 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Jun 5, 1985* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Heinz Gunthardt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Heinz Gunthardt | #1,013 | #22 | 0 | 1,966 | 225 | 189 | 54.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Heinz Gunthardt | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #55 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #26 | 1,832 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1981 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #38 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1982 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #85 | 1,722 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1983 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #25 | 1,853 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #31 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #36 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,670 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #954 | 1,663 | 0 | 5 |