Martin Jaite
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 3 | 9 | 12 | Sep 27, 1991 | H2H |
| Pablo Arraya | 7 | 1 | 8 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 7 | 0 | 7 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 14, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC
Jaime Oncins holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Jaite in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jaime Oncins leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jaime Oncins won the 1992 Sao Paulo quarterfinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jaime Oncins | 6-4 6-2 | Martin Jaite | Match data | Nov 14, 1992* | QF | Sao Paulo | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
| Jaime Oncins | 6-3 7-6(8) | Martin Jaite | Match data | Nov 7, 1992* | QF | Buzios | ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 275 | 158 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Jaime Oncins | #1,034 | #34 | 773 | 1,810 | 64 | 87 | 42.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #314 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #64 | 1,677 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #48 | 1,778 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 11–23 | 32.4% | #133 | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,948 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #230 | 1,505 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,768 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #222 | 1,508 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,491 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,681 | 0 | 12 | 1997 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,439 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,603 | 0 | 12 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #223 | 1,451 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1031 | 1,438 | 0 | 2 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 20 | 1985 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 32 | 12 | 44 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1990 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 33 | 12 | 45 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 13 | 10 | 23 | 56.5% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 40 | 12 | 52 | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 12 | 11 | 23 | 52.2% | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 29 | 9 | 38 | 76.3% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1995 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 51 | 39 | 90 | 56.7% | 208 | 106 | 314 | 66.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 32 | 42 | 74 | 43.2% | 30 | 39 | 69 | 43.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/87 of Martin Jaite's and 125/142 of Jaime Oncins's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 21 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 35/39 | 3.2 | 2.6 | 55.4% | 69.9% | 50.1% | 49.9% | 43.4% | 61.0% | 41.7% |
| 22 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 42/46 | 3.0 | 3.8 | 55.5% | 69.7% | 45.7% | 54.9% | 43.5% | 59.3% | 42.8% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 29/34 | 2.9 | 4.4 | 58.2% | 66.6% | 40.7% | 51.5% | 42.1% | 55.8% | 40.6% |
| 24 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 6/8 | 2.2 | 9.0 | 57.5% | 65.4% | 40.9% | 63.4% | 41.9% | 55.0% | 39.7% |
| 25 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3/3 | 3.0 | 5.3 | 60.8% | 70.0% | 43.9% | 63.0% | 24.5% | 59.4% | 39.6% |
| 26 | 1991 | 40/45 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 52.5% | 70.7% | 49.7% | 53.9% | 43.5% | 61.0% | 38.5% | 1996 | 2/2 | 1.5 | 18.5 | 45.0% | 69.3% | 28.9% | 47.3% | 28.6% | 47.0% | 43.5% |
| 27 | 1992 | 33/37 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 51.4% | 68.9% | 50.8% | 51.3% | 42.2% | 59.8% | 40.4% | 1997 | 6/6 | 3.0 | 9.7 | 51.8% | 67.9% | 35.1% | 48.8% | 61.9% | 52.0% | 35.0% |
| 28 | 1993 | 5/5 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 48.1% | 65.3% | 43.6% | 36.3% | 41.5% | 54.3% | 35.8% | 1998 | 1/3 | 4.0 | 8.0 | 57.7% | 66.7% | 31.8% | 33.3% | 33.3% | 51.9% | 35.1% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 13.0 | 56.5% | 63.9% | 46.8% | 60.0% | 50.0% | 56.5% | 39.3% |
| Career | — | 78/433 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 51.8% | 69.6% | 49.8% | 51.7% | 42.8% | 60.1% | 39.1% | — | 125/151 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 56.0% | 68.7% | 44.6% | 52.8% | 43.3% | 58.1% | 41.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Jaime Oncins | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1505 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1546 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 58.8% | +0.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.69 | 1988 | 1493 | 95.3 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | — | 42.9% | -1.86 | 0–1 | 3–0 (100%) | — | +0.30 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1679 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 54.3% | +0.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.05 | 1989 | 1471 | 95.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.19 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1814 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | -225 | +124 | — | 65.7% | +0.94 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–1 (91%) | — | +1.02 | 1990 | 1442 | 102.8 | — | — | — | — | +19 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.00 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.15 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1829 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +104 | — | 62.5% | +0.94 | 9–2 (82%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -1.18 | 1991 | 1677 | 121.5 | +0.13 | +1.64 | 1.068 | 51.1% | -83 | -50 | -66 | 55.6% | +0.24 | 5–9 (36%) | 5–4 (56%) | — | +1.89 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1891 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -345 | +124 | — | 66.7% | +1.10 | 9–8 (53%) | 12–8 (60%) | — | -0.79 | 1992 | 1778 | 131.6 | -1.02 | +2.52 | 1.052 | 50.9% | -123 | +21 | — | 58.1% | +0.28 | 7–7 (50%) | 11–3 (79%) | — | +1.08 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1741 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +115 | — | 56.7% | +0.57 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.19 | 1993 | 1584 | 130.7 | -3.35 | +1.16 | 0.920 | 48.2% | +18 | +63 | — | 39.3% | -0.56 | 5–11 (31%) | 2–9 (18%) | — | -0.21 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1948 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -114 | -9 | — | 69.3% | +1.12 | 14–6 (70%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | +0.50 | 1994 | 1506 | 104.0 | -2.79 | -0.18 | 0.883 | 47.5% | +74 | +44 | — | 36.4% | -0.86 | 0–6 (0%) | 0–2 | — | +0.29 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1768 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +142 | — | 58.3% | +0.39 | 11–7 (61%) | 11–6 (65%) | — | +1.68 | 1995 | 1509 | 108.4 | +0.94 | -0.26 | 0.977 | 49.5% | — | +44 | — | 33.3% | -0.50 | — | — | — | -0.02 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1707 | 146.0 | +0.84 | -0.20 | 0.987 | 49.8% | -22 | +147 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 11–3 (79%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | -3.34 | 1996 | 1491 | 108.9 | +1.07 | +2.59 | 0.821 | 45.2% | — | — | — | 28.6% | -2.14 | 0–1 | 1–1 | — | -0.08 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1682 | 122.5 | -0.08 | +0.48 | 1.004 | 50.2% | -2 | +24 | — | 46.1% | -0.28 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | 0.00 | 1997 | 1439 | 112.1 | -3.40 | -1.77 | 0.729 | 43.8% | +88 | +85 | — | 13.3% | -1.93 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.45 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1604 | 96.1 | -2.34 | -3.48 | 0.784 | 45.7% | — | +20 | — | 18.2% | -1.73 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.57 | 1998 | 1451 | 107.4 | -1.60 | -1.30 | 0.730 | 43.1% | +85 | — | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | — | 1–1 | — | -0.07 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1438 | 100.2 | +0.01 | -0.73 | 0.903 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.33 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.18 |
| Career | — | 1966 | 149.4 | +0.25 | -0.12 | 0.979 | 49.7% | -87 | +92 | — | 59.5% | +0.61 | 80–50 (62%) | 69–51 (58%) | 107.8 | -0.09 | — | 1810 | 127.5 | -1.35 | +1.50 | 0.987 | 49.6% | -49 | +28 | -66 | 47.0% | -0.28 | 17–39 (30%) | 23–23 (50%) | 90.4 | +1.95 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 3 | 9 | 12 | Sep 27, 1991 | H2H |
| Pablo Arraya | 7 | 1 | 8 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 7 | 0 | 7 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 14, 1991 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Francisco Clavet | 2 | 3 | 5 | Oct 26, 1995 | H2H |
| Renzo Furlan | 2 | 2 | 4 | Feb 4, 1994 | H2H |
| Tomas Carbonell | 2 | 2 | 4 | Jul 21, 1993 | H2H |
| Luiz Mattar | 0 | 4 | 4 | Nov 15, 1992 | H2H |
| Bernd Karbacher | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 1997 | H2H |