H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 3-1
Martin Jaite holds a 3–1 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Martin Jaite leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1990 Guaruja final 3-6 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 11, 1990* | Guaruja | ATP 250 | F | Hard | Martin Jaite | 3-6 6-4 6-3 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Nov 11, 1989* | Sao Paulo | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Martin Jaite | 6-4 6-4 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1989* | Rio de Janeiro | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Luiz Mattar | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Mar 11, 1988* | Orlando | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Martin Jaite | 2-6 6-4 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |