H2H data updated: 2026-09-02 00:00 UTC

Martin Jaite vs Paul Mcnamee H2H: 2-0

Martin Jaite holds a 2–0 lead over Paul Mcnamee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1987 Dutch Open round of 32 6-4 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Jaite
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Paul Mcnamee
AUS Age 71 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Jaite #15 6-4 6-0 Paul Mcnamee #108 Match data Jul 30, 1987* R32 Dutch Open ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #40 2-6 6-2 6-0 Paul Mcnamee #49 Match data Jul 13, 1985* QF U.S. Pro Tennis Championships ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 275 158 63.5% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Paul Mcnamee #524 #24 0 1,900 229 217 51.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Jaite Paul Mcnamee
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1972 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0
18 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0 1973 1–3 25.0% — 1,466 0 0
19 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0 1974 0–4 0.0% #318 1,439 0 0
20 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,814 0 1 — — — — — — —
21 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3 1976 2–8 20.0% #174 1,413 0 0
22 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5 1977 14–18 43.8% #84 1,603 0 0
23 1988 25–20 55.6% #54 1,741 0 5 1978 17–24 41.5% #120 1,654 0 0
24 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,948 0 9 1979 13–13 50.0% #82 1,692 0 0
25 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,768 0 11 1980 45–30 60.0% #40 1,882 0 1
26 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12 1981 14–11 56.0% #48 1,773 0 1
27 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,681 0 12 1982 23–16 59.0% #34 1,827 0 2
28 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,603 0 12 1983 38–26 59.4% #35 1,817 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1984 15–16 48.4% #61 1,726 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1985 13–12 52.0% #48 1,717 0 2
31 — — — — — — — 1986 24–19 55.8% #45 1,707 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 1987 7–14 33.3% #194 1,604 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 1988 3–2 60.0% #456 1,646 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Jaite Paul Mcnamee
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1983 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1973 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — 1974 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
20 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1976 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 40 12 52 76.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 12 13 25 48.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
23 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 15 16 31 48.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
24 1989 7 3 10 70.0% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 10 2 12 83.3% 1979 2 2 4 50.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1980 13 8 21 61.9% 11 9 20 55.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 10 8 18 55.6%
26 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1981 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1992 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 1993 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 7 5 12 58.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 10 5 15 66.7% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 0 1 1 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1 4 5 20.0% 17 10 27 63.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 39 90 56.7% 208 106 314 66.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — 35 38 73 47.9% 103 99 202 51.0% 55 46 101 54.5% 36 34 70 51.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Jaite Paul Mcnamee
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1505 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.34 1972 1492 102.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.19
18 1983 1546 116.6 — — — — — +29 — 58.8% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.69 1973 1466 94.3 — — — — — — +35 20.0% -1.90 1–0 — — +0.37
19 1984 1679 138.0 — — — — — +39 — 54.3% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1974 1439 107.1 — — — — — — +20 11.1% -1.45 0–1 1–4 (20%) — -0.40
20 1985 1814 148.5 — — — — -225 +124 — 65.7% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 10–1 (91%) — +1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1986 1829 149.1 — — — — — +104 — 62.5% +0.94 9–2 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.18 1976 1414 106.8 — — — — +83 +98 — 21.7% -1.35 0–1 0–5 (0%) — +0.74
22 1987 1891 153.1 — — — — -345 +124 — 66.7% +1.10 9–8 (53%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.79 1977 1603 140.6 — — — — — +58 -142 41.3% -0.60 3–2 (60%) 4–6 (40%) — -0.15
23 1988 1741 143.8 — — — — -84 +115 — 56.7% +0.57 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.19 1978 1655 130.9 — — — — -177 +90 -227 42.1% -0.46 5–5 (50%) 5–6 (45%) — +1.07
24 1989 1948 147.5 — — — — -114 -9 — 69.3% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.50 1979 1693 128.0 — — — — -194 +48 -201 48.4% -0.08 6–3 (67%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.46
25 1990 1768 136.5 — — — — -21 +142 — 58.3% +0.39 11–7 (61%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.68 1980 1882 152.0 — — — — -89 -75 -120 60.4% +0.48 6–12 (33%) 21–8 (72%) — -1.40
26 1991 1707 146.0 +0.84 -0.20 0.987 49.8% -22 +147 — 47.7% 0.00 11–3 (79%) 6–11 (35%) — -3.34 1981 1773 132.7 — — — — +11 -5 -30 57.6% +0.47 3–3 (50%) 3–2 (60%) — +1.51
27 1992 1682 122.5 -0.08 +0.48 1.004 50.2% -2 +24 — 46.1% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — 0.00 1982 1827 143.7 — — — — +32 -101 -6 56.3% +0.38 10–10 (50%) 10–12 (45%) — -0.05
28 1993 1604 96.1 -2.34 -3.48 0.784 45.7% — +20 — 18.2% -1.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 1983 1817 142.6 — — — — -5 -26 +9 53.6% +0.27 13–6 (68%) 16–14 (53%) — -0.72
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1726 140.2 — — — — +31 +84 +45 48.2% -0.05 5–5 (50%) 6–4 (60%) — -1.45
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1717 130.4 — — — — -26 +29 +129 58.6% +0.24 2–9 (18%) 8–2 (80%) — -0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1707 136.0 — — — — -61 +70 +161 52.8% +0.20 7–4 (64%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1605 124.6 — — — — -22 +116 +204 36.5% -0.85 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) — -0.58
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1646 110.2 — — — — -17 — — 50.0% -0.30 — — — +0.21
Career — 1966 149.4 +0.25 -0.12 0.979 49.7% -87 +92 — 59.5% +0.61 80–50 (62%) 69–51 (58%) 107.8 -0.09 — 1901 144.6 — — — — -36 +35 -14 50.8% +0.03 63–64 (50%) 86–77 (53%) 101.8 -0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.