Martin Jaite
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emilio Sanchez | 3 | 9 | 12 | Sep 27, 1991 | H2H |
| Pablo Arraya | 7 | 1 | 8 | Feb 7, 1992 | H2H |
| Mats Wilander | 1 | 7 | 8 | Jul 15, 1989 | H2H |
| Diego Perez | 7 | 0 | 7 | Nov 12, 1992 | H2H |
| Andres Gomez | 0 | 7 | 7 | Sep 14, 1991 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Peter Lundgren H2H: 0-1
Peter Lundgren holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Jaite in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Peter Lundgren leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Peter Lundgren won the 1990 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Lundgren | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Martin Jaite | Match data | Aug 16, 1990* | R32 | U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 275 | 158 | 63.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Peter Lundgren | #472 | #25 | 619 | 1,867 | 119 | 136 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 8–4 | 66.7% | #31 | 1,671 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #98 | 1,640 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #26 | 1,837 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #54 | 1,741 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #66 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,948 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #71 | 1,703 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,768 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #65 | 1,713 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1991 | 13–25 | 34.2% | #138 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,681 | 0 | 12 | 1992 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #213 | 1,579 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,603 | 0 | 12 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,569 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #386 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #384 | 1,535 | 0 | 3 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1982 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | — | — | — | — | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | — | — | — | — | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 5 | 4 | 9 | 55.6% | 32 | 12 | 44 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1985 | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 33 | 12 | 45 | 73.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 47.4% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 22 | 1987 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 40 | 12 | 52 | 76.9% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1987 | 22 | 10 | 32 | 68.8% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 6 | 3 | 9 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1988 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 14 | 12 | 26 | 53.8% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1988 | 16 | 14 | 30 | 53.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 7 | 3 | 10 | 70.0% | 29 | 9 | 38 | 76.3% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 2 | 12 | 83.3% | 1989 | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 64.7% | 17 | 10 | 27 | 63.0% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1990 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% |
| 26 | 1991 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 17 | 11 | 28 | 60.7% | — | — | — | — | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 1991 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 27 | 1992 | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 9 | 12 | 21 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 28 | 1993 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Career | — | 51 | 39 | 90 | 56.7% | 208 | 106 | 314 | 66.2% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 15 | 12 | 27 | 55.6% | — | 81 | 73 | 154 | 52.6% | 1 | 18 | 19 | 5.3% | 17 | 17 | 34 | 50.0% | 20 | 28 | 48 | 41.7% |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/87 of Martin Jaite's and 50/59 of Peter Lundgren's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | 1991 | 40/45 | 4.4 | 2.3 | 52.5% | 70.7% | 49.7% | 53.9% | 43.5% | 61.0% | 38.5% | 1991 | 29/38 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 52.7% | 68.7% | 47.7% | 58.6% | 41.7% | 58.6% | 35.2% |
| 27 | 1992 | 33/37 | 4.8 | 2.4 | 51.4% | 68.9% | 50.8% | 51.3% | 42.2% | 59.8% | 40.4% | 1992 | 13/13 | 5.2 | 4.5 | 49.9% | 71.2% | 50.6% | 46.2% | 36.3% | 60.8% | 34.3% |
| 28 | 1993 | 5/5 | 3.0 | 2.6 | 48.1% | 65.3% | 43.6% | 36.3% | 41.5% | 54.3% | 35.8% | 1993 | 1/1 | 8.0 | 4.0 | 50.0% | 74.4% | 53.5% | 57.1% | 18.2% | 64.0% | 37.3% |
| 29 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 5/5 | 4.2 | 4.2 | 52.0% | 63.0% | 48.2% | 44.9% | 30.1% | 56.2% | 38.3% |
| 30 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 2/2 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 56.8% | 74.6% | 66.3% | 80.0% | 50.0% | 71.2% | 34.3% |
| Career | — | 78/433 | 4.5 | 2.4 | 51.8% | 69.6% | 49.8% | 51.7% | 42.8% | 60.1% | 39.1% | — | 50/255 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 52.0% | 69.1% | 49.3% | 54.8% | 39.0% | 59.5% | 35.3% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Peter Lundgren | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1505 | 102.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.34 | 1–1 | — | — | +0.34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1546 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +29 | — | 58.8% | +0.18 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +0.69 | 1983 | 1515 | 107.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.75 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.11 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1679 | 138.0 | — | — | — | — | — | +39 | — | 54.3% | +0.20 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.05 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 1814 | 148.5 | — | — | — | — | -225 | +124 | — | 65.7% | +0.94 | 8–7 (53%) | 10–1 (91%) | — | +1.02 | 1985 | 1671 | 134.7 | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | — | 58.1% | +0.48 | 4–0 (100%) | 3–1 (75%) | — | -0.03 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1829 | 149.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +104 | — | 62.5% | +0.94 | 9–2 (82%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -1.18 | 1986 | 1640 | 129.6 | — | — | — | — | +37 | -156 | -99 | 41.6% | -0.36 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | +0.30 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1891 | 153.1 | — | — | — | — | -345 | +124 | — | 66.7% | +1.10 | 9–8 (53%) | 12–8 (60%) | — | -0.79 | 1987 | 1837 | 150.0 | — | — | — | — | +48 | -397 | — | 58.0% | +0.66 | 7–4 (64%) | 6–4 (60%) | — | +0.26 |
| 23 | 1988 | 1741 | 143.8 | — | — | — | — | -84 | +115 | — | 56.7% | +0.57 | 6–6 (50%) | 4–6 (40%) | — | +0.19 | 1988 | 1738 | 134.2 | — | — | — | — | +24 | — | -181 | 48.5% | +0.13 | 2–4 (33%) | 3–6 (33%) | — | -0.19 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1948 | 147.5 | — | — | — | — | -114 | -9 | — | 69.3% | +1.12 | 14–6 (70%) | 11–7 (61%) | — | +0.50 | 1989 | 1703 | 123.9 | — | — | — | — | -64 | — | +20 | 47.1% | -0.34 | 1–3 (25%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | -0.44 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1768 | 136.5 | — | — | — | — | -21 | +142 | — | 58.3% | +0.39 | 11–7 (61%) | 11–6 (65%) | — | +1.68 | 1990 | 1713 | 139.5 | — | — | — | — | +23 | — | -6 | 46.8% | -0.09 | 5–4 (56%) | 4–9 (31%) | — | -0.25 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1707 | 146.0 | +0.84 | -0.20 | 0.987 | 49.8% | -22 | +147 | — | 47.7% | 0.00 | 11–3 (79%) | 6–11 (35%) | — | -3.34 | 1991 | 1610 | 134.1 | -1.57 | -2.37 | 0.850 | 47.2% | +11 | -201 | +101 | 38.8% | -0.51 | 4–6 (40%) | 9–7 (56%) | — | -0.36 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1682 | 122.5 | -0.08 | +0.48 | 1.004 | 50.2% | -2 | +24 | — | 46.1% | -0.28 | 7–6 (54%) | 7–5 (58%) | — | 0.00 | 1992 | 1580 | 113.5 | -1.29 | -1.70 | 0.876 | 47.8% | +29 | — | — | 37.5% | -0.44 | 3–1 (75%) | 1–5 (17%) | — | +0.85 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1604 | 96.1 | -2.34 | -3.48 | 0.784 | 45.7% | — | +20 | — | 18.2% | -1.73 | 1–0 | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.57 | 1993 | 1570 | 104.4 | +0.11 | -1.94 | 1.034 | 49.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1534 | 101.7 | -1.08 | -1.39 | 0.875 | 47.1% | +40 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.08 | 1–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1536 | 100.9 | +2.06 | -2.27 | 1.192 | 52.6% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.25 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.29 |
| Career | — | 1966 | 149.4 | +0.25 | -0.12 | 0.979 | 49.7% | -87 | +92 | — | 59.5% | +0.61 | 80–50 (62%) | 69–51 (58%) | 107.8 | -0.09 | — | 1868 | 140.9 | -1.27 | -2.09 | 0.872 | 47.6% | +23 | -231 | -8 | 46.8% | -0.06 | 32–28 (53%) | 34–44 (44%) | 99.2 | +0.16 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Peter Lundgren
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 0 | 8 | 8 | Oct 24, 1991 | H2H |
| Ramesh Krishnan | 5 | 2 | 7 | Mar 16, 1991 | H2H |
| Andrei Chesnokov | 3 | 2 | 5 | Feb 10, 1994 | H2H |
| David Pate | 2 | 3 | 5 | Aug 1, 1991 | H2H |
| Amos Mansdorf | 0 | 4 | 4 | Jan 15, 1992 | H2H |