H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Martin Jaite vs Roberto Arguello H2H: 2-0
Martin Jaite holds a 2–0 lead over Roberto Arguello in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1987 Buenos Aires third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 63
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 19, 1987* | Buenos Aires | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-2 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
| Jul 24, 1986* | Boston | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-4 | Roberto Arguello | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
| Roberto Arguello | #829 | #38 | 144 | 1,718 | 60 | 82 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Jaite | Roberto Arguello | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #377 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #148 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #50 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #124 | 1,603 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #69 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #231 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #177 | 1,490 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 | 1988 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #177 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #190 | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 | 1990 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #217 | 1,465 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |