H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Martin Jaite vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 5-0

Martin Jaite holds a 5–0 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 4–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Martin Jaite won the 1992 Barcelona Open round of 32 7-6(5) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Jaite
ARG Age 61 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
5 – 0
5 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Jaite #48 7-6(5) 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #83 Match data Apr 9, 1992* R32 Barcelona Open ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 Clay
Martin Jaite #20 7-6 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #82 Match data Oct 18, 1990* R32 Vienna Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Martin Jaite #10 4-6 7-5 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #69 Match data Jul 27, 1990* R16 Dutch Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #28 6-3 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #145 Match data Sep 15, 1988* R32 Barcelona Open ATP 250 Clay
Martin Jaite #21 6-2 6-4 Tomas Carbonell #189 Match data Jun 11, 1988* QF Bologna ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Jaite #1,214 #10 1,226 1,965 275 158 63.5% 0 0 0 0 12 12
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Jaite Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1983 4–3 57.1% #285 1,546 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1984 11–8 57.9% #56 1,678 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1985 37–17 68.5% #20 1,814 0 1 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1986 34–15 69.4% #17 1,828 0 3 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1987 43–17 71.7% #14 1,890 0 5 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1988 25–20 55.6% #54 1,741 0 5 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1
24 1989 46–14 76.7% #11 1,948 0 9 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1
25 1990 31–19 62.0% #36 1,768 0 11 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1
26 1991 24–21 53.3% #46 1,706 0 12 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 1992 18–19 48.6% #120 1,681 0 12 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2
28 1993 1–4 20.0% #245 1,603 0 12 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 — — — — — — — 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2
30 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Jaite Tomas Carbonell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 — — — — 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 5 4 9 55.6% 32 12 44 72.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 33 12 45 73.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 3 4 7 42.9% 40 12 52 76.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1988 11 6 17 64.7% 14 12 26 53.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 7 3 10 70.0% 29 9 38 76.3% — — — — 10 2 12 83.3% 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1990 11 6 17 64.7% 17 10 27 63.0% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1991 5 7 12 41.7% 17 11 28 60.7% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1992 9 7 16 56.3% 9 12 21 42.9% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 1993 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 51 39 90 56.7% 208 106 314 66.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 12 27 55.6% — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 78/87 of Martin Jaite's and 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Jaite Tomas Carbonell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8%
26 1991 40/45 4.4 2.3 52.5% 70.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.5% 61.0% 38.5% 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6%
27 1992 33/37 4.8 2.4 51.4% 68.9% 50.8% 51.3% 42.2% 59.8% 40.4% 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4%
28 1993 5/5 3.0 2.6 48.1% 65.3% 43.6% 36.3% 41.5% 54.3% 35.8% 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3%
Career — 78/433 4.5 2.4 51.8% 69.6% 49.8% 51.7% 42.8% 60.1% 39.1% — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Jaite Tomas Carbonell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1505 102.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.34 1–1 — — +0.34 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40
18 1983 1546 116.6 — — — — — +29 — 58.8% +0.18 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.69 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21
19 1984 1679 138.0 — — — — — +39 — 54.3% +0.20 2–2 (50%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.05 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60
20 1985 1814 148.5 — — — — -225 +124 — 65.7% +0.94 8–7 (53%) 10–1 (91%) — +1.02 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.46
21 1986 1829 149.1 — — — — — +104 — 62.5% +0.94 9–2 (82%) 5–3 (63%) — -1.18 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) — -0.63
22 1987 1891 153.1 — — — — -345 +124 — 66.7% +1.10 9–8 (53%) 12–8 (60%) — -0.79 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) — -2.85
23 1988 1741 143.8 — — — — -84 +115 — 56.7% +0.57 6–6 (50%) 4–6 (40%) — +0.19 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.61
24 1989 1948 147.5 — — — — -114 -9 — 69.3% +1.12 14–6 (70%) 11–7 (61%) — +0.50 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.48
25 1990 1768 136.5 — — — — -21 +142 — 58.3% +0.39 11–7 (61%) 11–6 (65%) — +1.68 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.63
26 1991 1707 146.0 +0.84 -0.20 0.987 49.8% -22 +147 — 47.7% 0.00 11–3 (79%) 6–11 (35%) — -3.34 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) — -0.06
27 1992 1682 122.5 -0.08 +0.48 1.004 50.2% -2 +24 — 46.1% -0.28 7–6 (54%) 7–5 (58%) — 0.00 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.23
28 1993 1604 96.1 -2.34 -3.48 0.784 45.7% — +20 — 18.2% -1.73 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.57 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) — +0.37
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) — -0.26
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25
Career — 1966 149.4 +0.25 -0.12 0.979 49.7% -87 +92 — 59.5% +0.61 80–50 (62%) 69–51 (58%) 107.8 -0.09 — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.