H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Martin Laurendeau vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-1
Martin Laurendeau and Paul Annacone are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on grass, while Martin Laurendeau leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1988 Wimbledon first round 6-0 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CAN
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1988* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Paul Annacone | 6-0 6-2 6-3 | Martin Laurendeau | Match data |
| Aug 7, 1986* | Stratton Mountain | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Martin Laurendeau | 6-3 4-6 7-6 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Laurendeau | #1,332 | #90 | 242 | 1,655 | 36 | 58 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Laurendeau | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #144 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #191 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #104 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #229 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #154 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1992 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #212 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |