H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Martin Sinner vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-2

Martin Sinner and Mark Woodforde are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Mark Woodforde leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Martin Sinner leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Mark Woodforde won the 1997 Tokyo third round 6-1 6-4.

GER Age 58 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 2
4 main draw meetings
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 17, 1997* Tokyo ATP 250 R32 Hard Mark Woodforde #71 6-1 6-4 Martin Sinner #134 Match data
Oct 4, 1996* Singapore ATP 250 R16 Carpet Martin Sinner #162 6-2 6-3 Mark Woodforde #30 Match data
Jan 19, 1996* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Mark Woodforde #67 6-4 6-1 6-4 Martin Sinner #59 Match data
Jan 4, 1991* Adelaide ATP 250 R16 Hard Martin Sinner #111 4-6 6-3 6-4 Mark Woodforde #101 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Martin Sinner #947 #42 819 1,678 49 78 38.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,922 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Sinner Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,546 0 1
21 1989 1–2 33.3% #198 1,509 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1990 4–4 50.0% #111 1,549 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,800 0 2
23 1991 3–6 33.3% #215 1,527 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,710 0 3
24 1992 0–1 0.0% #232 1,515 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,716 0 3
25 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,631 0 3
26 1994 2–3 40.0% #125 1,518 0 0 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,814 0 3
27 1995 16–22 42.1% #55 1,546 0 2 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 1996 7–12 36.8% #144 1,578 0 2 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 1997 8–14 36.4% #123 1,563 0 2 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,760 0 4
30 1998 8–14 36.4% #129 1,509 0 2 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,800 0 4
31 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,731 0 4
32 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,611 0 4
34 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,584 0 4