H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Albert Costa H2H: 0-1
Albert Costa holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Albert Costa leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Albert Costa won the 2002 Amersfoort fourth round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 51
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2002* | Amersfoort | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Albert Costa | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Albert Costa | #669 | #6 | 2,385 | 1,996 | 368 | 263 | 58.3% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Albert Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #52 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 46–26 | 63.9% | #13 | 1,750 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,830 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 47–26 | 64.4% | #14 | 1,759 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,810 | 0 | 11 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #26 | 1,779 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #40 | 1,807 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #9 | 1,796 | 1 | 12 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,767 | 1 | 12 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #56 | 1,668 | 1 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #116 | 1,619 | 1 | 12 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #623 | 1,631 | 1 | 12 |