H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Andy Roddick H2H: 1-1
Martin Verkerk and Andy Roddick are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on clay, while Andy Roddick leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2003 Rome Masters third round 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 43
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2003* | Rome Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Martin Verkerk | 6-7(6) 6-3 6-4 | Andy Roddick | Match data |
| Aug 28, 2002* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Andy Roddick | 7-6(2) 6-3 6-4 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Andy Roddick | #40 | #1 | 5,800 | 2,177 | 577 | 196 | 74.6% | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 22 | 32 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Andy Roddick | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #156 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 51–19 | 72.9% | #10 | 1,923 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 71–18 | 79.8% | #1 | 2,092 | 1 | 11 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 66–15 | 81.5% | #2 | 2,078 | 1 | 15 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 56–14 | 80.0% | #3 | 2,031 | 1 | 20 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 46–17 | 73.0% | #6 | 1,998 | 1 | 21 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 48–16 | 75.0% | #6 | 2,009 | 1 | 23 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 47–16 | 74.6% | #8 | 2,008 | 1 | 26 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #7 | 2,046 | 1 | 27 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #8 | 1,988 | 1 | 29 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2011 | 32–15 | 68.1% | #14 | 2,024 | 1 | 30 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 22–12 | 64.7% | #39 | 1,987 | 1 | 32 |