H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Martin Verkerk vs Cecil Mamiit H2H: 1-0

Martin Verkerk holds a 1–0 lead over Cecil Mamiit in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2004 Scottsdale round of 16 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Verkerk
NED Age 47 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Cecil Mamiit
PHI Age 50 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Martin Verkerk #19 6-2 4-6 6-3 Cecil Mamiit #193 Match data Mar 5, 2004* R16 Scottsdale International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Verkerk #984 #14 1,485 1,857 56 64 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Cecil Mamiit #1,573 #72 625 1,631 48 95 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Verkerk Cecil Mamiit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 1–1 50.0% #416 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — 1996 0–4 0.0% #200 1,471 0 0
21 2000 0–1 0.0% #233 1,499 0 0 1997 2–7 22.2% #229 1,441 0 0
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #161 1,479 0 0 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,432 0 0
23 2002 8–10 44.4% #86 1,601 0 0 1999 16–18 47.1% #93 1,552 0 0
24 2003 24–24 50.0% #19 1,699 0 1 2000 6–12 33.3% #121 1,537 0 0
25 2004 23–15 60.5% #55 1,785 0 2 2001 10–18 35.7% #111 1,555 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2002 8–14 36.4% #111 1,555 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2003 3–15 16.7% #183 1,433 0 0
28 2007 0–9 0.0% #678 1,612 0 2 2004 1–3 25.0% #226 1,492 0 0
29 2008 0–3 0.0% #263 1,556 0 2 2005 1–2 33.3% #209 1,469 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2008 1–1 50.0% #462 1,468 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Verkerk Cecil Mamiit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 13 12 25 52.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
24 2003 6 12 18 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2000 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 8 14 22 36.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 6 9 15 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 27 43 37.2% 29 27 56 51.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — 39 71 110 35.5% 4 10 14 28.6% 4 13 17 23.5% 1 1 2 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 113/120 of Martin Verkerk's and 128/143 of Cecil Mamiit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Verkerk Cecil Mamiit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
19 1998 1/2 2.0 0.0 57.4% 64.5% 60.9% 60.0% 0.0% 63.0% 24.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/4 2.7 5.3 45.4% 60.2% 51.2% 50.2% 42.9% 55.3% 33.2%
21 2000 1/1 12.0 4.0 51.5% 83.0% 38.0% 66.7% 25.0% 61.2% 35.0% 1997 8/9 4.4 2.0 59.6% 67.9% 47.4% 49.8% 55.1% 59.7% 35.8%
22 2001 1/1 5.0 5.0 47.1% 60.0% 51.1% 64.3% 37.5% 55.3% 41.8% 1998 1/1 3.0 2.0 61.5% 70.8% 56.7% 42.9% 80.0% 65.4% 42.9%
23 2002 13/18 11.0 4.7 59.0% 75.1% 50.5% 51.0% 36.1% 64.9% 31.0% 1999 32/34 2.6 3.0 57.3% 65.9% 47.7% 50.8% 38.8% 58.0% 39.6%
24 2003 47/48 14.4 5.8 58.5% 77.3% 50.7% 61.6% 46.4% 66.3% 33.5% 2000 14/18 2.4 2.8 54.3% 67.2% 48.8% 56.2% 38.3% 59.0% 36.7%
25 2004 38/38 12.8 4.3 60.8% 78.0% 52.6% 62.3% 42.3% 67.9% 33.0% 2001 23/28 4.2 3.0 58.1% 67.3% 49.1% 61.8% 35.1% 59.7% 36.4%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2002 20/22 3.5 3.3 57.9% 66.7% 49.9% 60.6% 39.4% 59.5% 37.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 18/18 1.8 2.7 62.6% 62.6% 42.3% 49.5% 41.2% 55.2% 34.4%
28 2007 9/9 5.9 3.1 64.5% 65.4% 48.7% 52.7% 30.2% 59.4% 25.7% 2004 4/4 3.8 1.8 51.5% 68.5% 51.2% 54.3% 24.2% 59.9% 37.9%
29 2008 3/3 15.7 5.3 63.4% 76.3% 52.4% 27.8% 40.0% 67.4% 28.1% 2005 3/3 3.7 2.0 68.5% 74.3% 58.9% 36.4% 27.8% 69.5% 36.5%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 2/2 5.5 2.0 60.9% 72.3% 51.4% 61.1% 54.2% 63.8% 35.8%
Career — 113/120 12.6 4.9 59.7% 76.1% 51.2% 59.1% 41.7% 66.0% 32.3% — 128/143 3.1 2.9 58.0% 66.4% 48.2% 54.5% 39.5% 58.8% 37.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Verkerk Cecil Mamiit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1998 1516 106.7 +2.90 -3.07 0.663 43.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1471 104.3 +1.39 -2.25 0.743 44.8% +17 — — 18.2% -2.27 0–2 1–1 — -0.21
21 2000 1500 96.7 +0.40 +2.35 0.901 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.15 1997 1441 108.9 -1.33 -0.30 0.887 47.8% +21 — — 30.4% -1.17 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — +0.42
22 2001 1480 97.1 -0.46 +0.13 0.934 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.29 1998 1432 101.1 -0.76 -1.41 1.238 53.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.13
23 2002 1602 127.8 +0.70 -2.38 0.885 49.0% -26 -19 — 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20 1999 1552 118.6 -2.72 +1.29 0.942 48.7% +21 -25 -7 46.0% -0.43 6–6 (50%) 7–5 (58%) — +1.34
24 2003 1700 139.9 +3.88 -2.99 0.994 50.1% -69 +112 — 50.8% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.05 2000 1538 123.5 -0.49 +0.64 0.895 47.9% +26 — — 38.6% -0.75 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.42
25 2004 1785 129.8 +3.40 -2.49 1.026 50.8% -149 +97 -235 55.4% +0.25 9–4 (69%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.25 2001 1556 118.7 -2.71 -1.19 0.903 48.3% -16 — -31 44.3% -0.54 3–10 (23%) 5–4 (56%) — +1.11
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1556 122.3 -2.06 -0.26 0.918 48.5% +28 — -90 38.9% -0.89 1–3 (25%) 6–1 (86%) — +0.65
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1434 110.8 -4.02 -1.08 0.769 45.2% +49 +79 +15 26.7% -1.56 1–4 (20%) 4–4 (50%) — -0.14
28 2007 1612 108.4 -2.09 -4.90 0.633 43.2% — +94 — 0.0% -2.53 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.46 2004 1493 110.5 -0.62 +1.04 0.944 49.1% +47 — — 37.5% -0.38 1–1 — — -0.32
29 2008 1556 100.0 -1.32 -3.88 0.862 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.50 2005 1469 101.4 +0.98 -1.17 1.195 52.7% +44 — — 60.0% +1.00 0–1 — — +0.37
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1430 95.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1433 89.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1469 105.8 -0.73 -1.29 0.989 49.4% — — — 40.0% -0.40 1–0 0–1 — +0.10
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1449 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1440 101.1 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1432 98.6 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1858 133.6 +2.66 -2.85 0.949 49.5% -80 +91 -235 47.1% -0.18 20–20 (50%) 30–26 (54%) 104.7 +1.97 — 1631 117.9 -2.17 -0.11 0.899 48.0% +20 +21 -35 39.3% -0.78 15–34 (31%) 24–20 (55%) 99.3 +2.12

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.