H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Galo Blanco H2H: 1-0
Martin Verkerk holds a 1–0 lead over Galo Blanco in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Martin Verkerk leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Martin Verkerk won the 2002 Kitzbuhel second round 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 49
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2002* | Kitzbuhel | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Martin Verkerk | 7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | Galo Blanco | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Galo Blanco | #809 | #40 | 963 | 1,750 | 122 | 175 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Galo Blanco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #470 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #164 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #52 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #82 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #75 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #114 | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #134 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #99 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #174 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #822 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |