H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Jean-Rene Lisnard H2H: 0-1
Jean-Rene Lisnard holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jean-Rene Lisnard leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jean-Rene Lisnard won the 2003 Munich third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MON
Age 46
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2003* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jean-Rene Lisnard | 6-2 6-4 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Jean-Rene Lisnard | #1,437 | #84 | 478 | 1,693 | 41 | 79 | 34.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Jean-Rene Lisnard | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #194 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #264 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #105 | 1,634 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #97 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #132 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #103 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #295 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2009 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #353 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1437 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |