H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Mark Philippoussis H2H: 1-2
Mark Philippoussis holds a 2–1 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Mark Philippoussis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Mark Philippoussis won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 49
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Mark Philippoussis | 4-6 6-3 7-6(5) 7-5 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2004* | Sydney | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Martin Verkerk | 6-4 7-6(4) | Mark Philippoussis | Match data |
| Jan 15, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Mark Philippoussis | 6-4 6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Mark Philippoussis | #1,115 | #8 | 2,296 | 2,022 | 287 | 190 | 60.2% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Mark Philippoussis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #274 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #38 | 1,764 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #30 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 43–18 | 70.5% | #18 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #15 | 1,906 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 30–15 | 66.7% | #19 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,894 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #104 | 1,803 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,772 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #9 | 1,881 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #109 | 1,669 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #171 | 1,659 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #114 | 1,732 | 0 | 11 |