H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Martin Verkerk vs Nicolas Lapentti H2H: 0-2

Nicolas Lapentti holds a 2–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicolas Lapentti leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicolas Lapentti won the 2007 Poertschach round of 32 6-4 7-6(4).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Martin Verkerk
NED Age 47 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Nicolas Lapentti
ECU Age 50 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicolas Lapentti #65 6-4 7-6(4) Martin Verkerk #711 Match data May 23, 2007* R32 Poertschach International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Nicolas Lapentti #62 7-5 6-4 Martin Verkerk #18 Match data Mar 10, 2004* R64 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Martin Verkerk #984 #14 1,485 1,857 56 64 46.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicolas Lapentti #885 #6 2,293 1,933 282 283 49.9% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Martin Verkerk Nicolas Lapentti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1995 5–0 100.0% #109 1,594 0 1
19 1998 1–1 50.0% #416 1,516 0 0 1996 11–20 35.5% #121 1,568 0 1
20 — — — — — — — 1997 17–18 48.6% #63 1,658 0 1
21 2000 0–1 0.0% #233 1,499 0 0 1998 16–29 35.6% #90 1,595 0 1
22 2001 0–1 0.0% #161 1,479 0 0 1999 52–24 68.4% #8 1,883 0 3
23 2002 8–10 44.4% #86 1,601 0 0 2000 40–28 58.8% #24 1,750 0 3
24 2003 24–24 50.0% #19 1,699 0 1 2001 30–22 57.7% #23 1,835 0 4
25 2004 23–15 60.5% #55 1,785 0 2 2002 32–27 54.2% #29 1,713 0 5
26 — — — — — — — 2003 20–22 47.6% #57 1,696 0 5
27 — — — — — — — 2004 7–15 31.8% #122 1,587 0 5
28 2007 0–9 0.0% #678 1,612 0 2 2005 9–16 36.0% #95 1,575 0 5
29 2008 0–3 0.0% #263 1,556 0 2 2006 12–9 57.1% #67 1,680 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 2007 10–14 41.7% #109 1,610 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 2008 14–18 43.8% #86 1,650 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2009 6–14 30.0% #97 1,667 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2010 1–7 12.5% #447 1,581 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Martin Verkerk Nicolas Lapentti
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 5 0 5 100.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 1 8 9 11.1% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 3 6 9 33.3% 14 11 25 56.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 4 11 15 26.7% 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 22 12 34 64.7% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0%
23 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 23 15 38 60.5% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
24 2003 6 12 18 33.3% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 2001 12 10 22 54.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
25 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 13 5 18 72.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 10 12 22 45.5% 16 12 28 57.1% 4 1 5 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 6 7 13 46.2% 11 11 22 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 5 6 11 45.5% 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — — — — —
28 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 0 7 7 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 3 7 10 30.0% 6 7 13 46.2% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 2008 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 4 6 10 40.0% 9 9 18 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 5 8 37.5% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 16 27 43 37.2% 29 27 56 51.8% 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% — 100 114 214 46.7% 154 136 290 53.1% 10 16 26 38.5% 18 17 35 51.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 113/120 of Martin Verkerk's and 490/565 of Nicolas Lapentti's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Martin Verkerk Nicolas Lapentti
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 3/5 6.3 2.7 62.2% 77.3% 59.8% 64.6% 47.2% 70.1% 38.4%
19 1998 1/2 2.0 0.0 57.4% 64.5% 60.9% 60.0% 0.0% 63.0% 24.6% 1996 25/31 3.8 3.4 56.2% 67.4% 47.9% 49.9% 41.1% 58.8% 37.9%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 32/35 4.4 2.8 60.4% 71.2% 48.1% 56.0% 46.1% 61.9% 40.2%
21 2000 1/1 12.0 4.0 51.5% 83.0% 38.0% 66.7% 25.0% 61.2% 35.0% 1998 40/45 3.4 3.8 63.2% 67.2% 44.6% 49.7% 42.8% 58.7% 38.4%
22 2001 1/1 5.0 5.0 47.1% 60.0% 51.1% 64.3% 37.5% 55.3% 41.8% 1999 59/76 5.3 2.4 61.7% 72.0% 50.2% 64.0% 40.2% 63.5% 40.7%
23 2002 13/18 11.0 4.7 59.0% 75.1% 50.5% 51.0% 36.1% 64.9% 31.0% 2000 53/68 6.3 3.4 57.6% 72.3% 49.1% 61.4% 43.9% 62.4% 38.6%
24 2003 47/48 14.4 5.8 58.5% 77.3% 50.7% 61.6% 46.4% 66.3% 33.5% 2001 38/52 5.7 3.2 56.1% 74.4% 47.9% 57.3% 41.7% 62.8% 38.8%
25 2004 38/38 12.8 4.3 60.8% 78.0% 52.6% 62.3% 42.3% 67.9% 33.0% 2002 49/59 6.6 2.6 59.0% 73.4% 49.0% 49.6% 35.4% 63.3% 38.5%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 41/42 4.9 2.2 61.5% 69.0% 50.1% 56.3% 40.4% 61.7% 36.8%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 21/22 4.1 2.3 58.4% 68.7% 52.6% 56.8% 36.5% 62.0% 35.6%
28 2007 9/9 5.9 3.1 64.5% 65.4% 48.7% 52.7% 30.2% 59.4% 25.7% 2005 25/25 3.2 1.6 64.4% 68.8% 50.2% 52.2% 32.3% 62.2% 35.8%
29 2008 3/3 15.7 5.3 63.4% 76.3% 52.4% 27.8% 40.0% 67.4% 28.1% 2006 21/21 3.5 1.4 63.2% 68.6% 45.4% 60.5% 42.1% 60.2% 41.5%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 24/24 4.3 2.3 60.5% 68.8% 44.7% 57.7% 37.1% 59.0% 34.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 31/32 3.2 2.0 62.5% 68.6% 50.4% 50.4% 43.5% 61.9% 36.0%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/20 4.4 2.7 60.2% 66.9% 49.5% 55.4% 40.2% 60.0% 36.1%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 8/8 1.6 2.3 53.8% 62.6% 45.5% 40.0% 35.4% 54.9% 34.4%
Career — 113/120 12.6 4.9 59.7% 76.1% 51.2% 59.1% 41.7% 66.0% 32.3% — 490/565 4.7 2.7 60.2% 70.3% 48.7% 55.7% 40.4% 61.6% 38.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Martin Verkerk Nicolas Lapentti
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1595 115.3 +3.11 +1.13 1.285 52.9% — +53 — 83.3% +1.67 2–0 1–1 — +0.73
19 1998 1516 106.7 +2.90 -3.07 0.663 43.2% — — — 50.0% +0.25 — — — -0.16 1996 1569 122.4 -2.38 -0.82 0.920 48.4% -108 +97 +28 40.5% -0.77 7–8 (47%) 12–6 (67%) — +0.89
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1659 129.3 +0.24 +1.23 1.054 50.8% -156 +64 — 45.0% -0.14 5–6 (45%) 3–6 (33%) — +0.41
21 2000 1500 96.7 +0.40 +2.35 0.901 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.15 1998 1595 132.1 -1.83 +0.31 0.932 48.6% -86 +85 — 40.4% -0.57 5–9 (36%) 5–8 (38%) — -0.69
22 2001 1480 97.1 -0.46 +0.13 0.934 48.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.29 1999 1883 154.4 +1.96 +3.11 1.116 52.2% -43 -24 — 59.3% +0.58 22–7 (76%) 17–14 (55%) — -1.12
23 2002 1602 127.8 +0.70 -2.38 0.885 49.0% -26 -19 — 42.9% -0.43 3–4 (43%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.20 2000 1751 142.0 +0.96 +0.97 1.026 50.6% +22 +87 -251 53.7% +0.39 16–5 (76%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.98
24 2003 1700 139.9 +3.88 -2.99 0.994 50.1% -69 +112 — 50.8% +0.02 8–8 (50%) 14–12 (54%) — +0.05 2001 1836 155.3 +1.70 +1.34 1.041 50.6% -27 +112 — 55.1% +0.40 10–5 (67%) 7–10 (41%) — -1.27
25 2004 1785 129.8 +3.40 -2.49 1.026 50.8% -149 +97 -235 55.4% +0.25 9–4 (69%) 13–7 (65%) — +1.25 2002 1713 133.6 +1.50 +0.61 1.049 50.5% +6 +68 -121 50.6% +0.13 18–9 (67%) 13–13 (50%) — +1.94
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1697 131.8 -0.81 -0.35 0.961 49.4% -25 +79 — 48.2% -0.17 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) — +0.89
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1588 121.8 -0.38 -0.79 0.938 48.5% +44 +67 — 38.0% -0.68 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) — +0.01
28 2007 1612 108.4 -2.09 -4.90 0.633 43.2% — +94 — 0.0% -2.53 — 0–3 (0%) — +0.46 2005 1575 129.8 -0.05 -0.90 0.948 48.9% -6 +95 — 37.5% -0.70 2–5 (29%) 6–5 (55%) — -1.17
29 2008 1556 100.0 -1.32 -3.88 0.862 48.3% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–2 1–1 — +0.50 2006 1681 124.7 -1.29 +2.41 1.042 50.7% — +73 — 52.7% +0.05 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) — +0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1611 123.4 -2.74 -2.10 0.829 47.0% -49 +93 -16 38.3% -0.87 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) — +0.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1650 136.2 -0.69 -0.13 0.944 48.9% -103 +132 — 48.1% -0.15 6–8 (43%) 8–7 (53%) — +0.36
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1667 132.7 -1.19 +0.26 0.902 48.2% -65 +134 — 40.7% -0.64 5–8 (38%) 7–2 (78%) — -1.19
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1581 117.8 -2.88 -0.42 0.762 44.8% +18 +71 — 26.3% -1.74 0–2 0–1 — -0.76
Career — 1858 133.6 +2.66 -2.85 0.949 49.5% -80 +91 -235 47.1% -0.18 20–20 (50%) 30–26 (54%) 104.7 +1.97 — 1934 143.0 -0.03 +0.60 0.990 49.8% -30 +76 -105 48.7% -0.07 114–88 (56%) 108–103 (51%) 107.5 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.