H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Martin Verkerk vs Raemon Sluiter H2H: 0-1
Raemon Sluiter holds a 1–0 lead over Martin Verkerk in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Raemon Sluiter leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Raemon Sluiter won the 2003 Rotterdam third round 3-6 6-4 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 47
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 48
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2003* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Raemon Sluiter | 3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | Martin Verkerk | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Martin Verkerk | #984 | #14 | 1,485 | 1,862 | 56 | 64 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Raemon Sluiter | #1,007 | #46 | 742 | 1,749 | 84 | 121 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Martin Verkerk | Raemon Sluiter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #716 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #416 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #241 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #233 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #162 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #161 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #95 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2002 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #86 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #131 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2003 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #19 | 1,701 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #71 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2004 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #55 | 1,785 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #59 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #82 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #106 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2007 | 0–9 | 0.0% | #678 | 1,612 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #119 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #263 | 1,556 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #169 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1040 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #197 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |